Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,490
37,774


Apple is no longer developing augmented reality glasses designed to pair with the Mac, reports Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Apple wanted to create smart glasses that looked like regular glasses, but had augmented reality capabilities.

Apple-Glasses-Purple-Feature.jpg

Apple was developing AR glasses that connect to a Mac for power, because a chip powerful enough for AR applications would not fit in a device that's the size of standard glasses. Apple engineers determined that the AR glasses would need to provide the performance of an iPhone with a tenth of the power consumption, otherwise the chip would simply run too hot. Adding a battery to the glasses would also be problematic because of the weight.

At first, Apple wanted the glasses to connect to the iPhone, but the iPhone didn't have the power or battery life to support them. Apple then transitioned to using the Mac as a power source, but Apple executives weren't convinced a Mac-connected device was a good solution, leading to the shutdown of the project.

The AR glasses that Apple worked on were lighter than the Vision Pro and did not require a head strap, nor was there a front-facing screen showing the wearer's eyes. Apple reportedly created lenses that could change tint based on what the wearer was doing, such as doing work, as a signal to people around them.

There have been rumors about Apple's work on AR glasses for almost 10 years now, and the Vision Pro headset is what Apple built because the technology doesn't yet exist for the kind of augmented reality glasses that Apple is aiming for.

Back in 2023, Gurman said that the AR glasses were a running joke on the AR/VR team because it was a "hopeless" device they worked on to keep Apple CEO Tim Cook happy. Back in 2017, Cook himself said that the technology to make AR smart glasses "in a quality way" simply didn't exist, and it appears that's still the case.

While Apple's work on augmented reality glasses has been paused, the company is still developing new versions of the Vision Pro, and when the technology exists, Apple executives want to revisit the possibility of a set of AR glasses.

Apple's smart glasses featured projectors able to display information like images and video to the wearer, and Apple is continuing to work on custom microLED displays that could one day be used in AR glasses.

Apple competitor Meta has already demonstrated its "Orion" augmented reality glasses that are in development, but the glasses are in a prototyping stage and cost over $10,000 to make. Meta is aiming to release the glasses by 2027, which is also when Apple was originally planning to debut its now-canceled smart glasses.

Article Link: Apple Cancels Mac-Connected AR Smart Glasses
 
Apple was developing AR glasses that connect to a Mac for power, because a chip powerful enough for AR applications would not fit in a device that's the size of standard glasses. Apple engineers determined that the AR glasses would need to provide the performance of an iPhone with a tenth of the power consumption, otherwise the chip would simply run too hot. Adding a battery to the glasses would also be problematic because of the weight.

Correct

The tech to do this type of product really well ... is quite a ways off yet
 
"not for Mac" doesn't solve the stated power/heat/weight issues
no it doesn't, but Gurman is just his usual wishy washy. Like the VPro or not, the direction this technology is going is to be smaller/lighter etc. It just doesn't make sense imho to develop a breakthrough tech/product for a tethered use case.
Are we a long time from this? Sure thing
 
AR glasses isn't paused. VisionOS is also the bedrock for any VR AR product Apple releases. People loose sight about why Apple released AVP. They need time to develop the operating system and app ecosystem. AR glasses will simply run this OS without the VR component.
 
I think the XReal One's do basically the same thing now...but the key difference here is its just mirroring whats on the mac or phone...its not processing anything.

Heres what apple should focus on....a smart glasses that act basically like a combination of what XReal and Meta are doing...which basically just mirrors phone functionality to a pair of glasses. Your on a long flight and want to listen to some music or watch a movie, you plug in your smart glasses into your phone and blam...doing it. Want to take a few photos via your glasses or use Apple Intelligence...blam...done.

This idea of basically jamming a Apple Vision Pro into a standard form of sun glasses is decades away and how do you physically do this with battery and processing and heat limitations....its not happening anytime soon. At best, you could slim it down a bit and have a ski goggles type device that plugs into a battery or phone with a cable...as steve jobs once said in an interview "Headphones for your eyes". But this tony stark super smart glasses where you just wear them and you use hand gestures out in public to opperate the system is maybe 10 years away from being affordable and practiable!

I love how the work is being done now to get there...but people have such lofty expectations for these devices that if they dont get it out of the gate, the whole idea is dead on arival.

Id love apple to put out their own version of Meta's Rayband's which i do own, and love, but the battery life SUCKS on them espically after a year of use and it pisses me off they couldent just make it where i could unscrew a section on the frames and swap out a battery for a healthier new one! Like that one design flaw of style over usability infuriates me.

If i could afford one, id easly go out and buy an apple vision pro, but knowing full well this thing is never leaving the house. It is not meant to be out in public every day.

The best mixture device i feel is possably the XReal One's pro due out in march which im debating based off of reviews is the best solution.

You dont degrade an internal battery like the Meta Raybands, it mirrors your phones apps, it has the capablity for a camera...(which is an add on)

so if apple just did a version of glasses like that...i think that would sell like crazy and then gradually work on reducing the dependence on a iphone, getting better battery life on its own and processing power...so by 2050 you then have that dream AR Glasses interface with decades of apps and development behind it.

Its an end goal product, not a starting one!
 
AR glasses for the masses have always been a dumb idea whether from Google, Meta or Apple and would have sold far worse than Vision Pro. I mean what for? For who? Apple did the right thing and are better off getting gaming and more developer tools for Visón Pro. Once there is better content for Vision Pro it will be a more viable product.
 
Correction for the MacRumours article. Meta Project Orion will not ship. It has been stated over and over by their CTO Andrew Bosworth What will ship will have different specs to meet a price point of $1-2k consumer product. So think about how much will be paired back for $10k prototype to meet $1-2k. FOV has been clearly stated will be the first to limit.
 
Last edited:
AR glasses isn't paused. VisionOS is also the bedrock for any VR AR product Apple releases. People loose sight about why Apple released AVP. They need time to develop the operating system and app ecosystem. AR glasses will simply run this OS without the VR component.
Just like how Apple hasn’t released a foldable or an all screen phone, many companies will have AR glasses out YEARS before Apple jumps into the ring. What does Apple really even bring to the table these days? What’s next to look forward to? Another heavy VR headset that has very little apps? A “home hub” aka a iPad on your wall? A “smart” camera? Yes, there’s probably a foldable device on the way, but at what cost? The Apple tax on a foldable device will be massive and cost AT LEAST $2,500.
 
Correction for the MacRumours article. Meta Project Orion will not ship. It has been sated over and over by their CTO Andrew Bosworth What will ship will have different specs to meet a price point of $1-2k consumer product. So think about how much will be paired back for $10k prototype to meet $1-2k. FOV has been clearly stated will be the first to limit.
Still better than what Apple has to offer…
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.