Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,490
37,777


With the explosive popularity of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, there have been rumors that Apple is working on its own AI product, and that some kind of "Apple GPT" artificial intelligence bot could launch in the future.

hey-siri-banner-apple.jpg

This guide highlights everything we know about Apple's experiments with AI, and it will be updated regularly as new rumors come out.

Internal Testing and Development

Apple's AI chief John Giannandrea is leading development on large language models within Apple, and Giannandrea reports directly to Apple CEO Tim Cook. Giannandrea established a team that works on conversational AI four years ago, and work has since ramped up.

For the last several months, Apple has been testing an "Apple GPT" rival that could compete with ChatGPT. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, work on AI is a priority for Apple, with the company designing an "Ajax" framework for large language models.

Apple has an internal chatbot that some engineers have been referring to as "Apple GPT," but Apple would not, of course, ever use that naming for a consumer product. Apple employees need special permission to use the chatbot, and its output cannot be used to develop new product features for customers. It is used for product prototyping and it is able to answer questions about the data that was used to train it.

Ajax is said to be more capable than the prior-generation ChatGPT 3.5, and it has been trained on more than 200 billion parameters. As of September 2023, OpenAI's newer models are more powerful than Ajax. Apple reportedly does not have a "clear strategy" for how it will create a generative AI product for consumers. Apple is experimenting with Siri enhancements, software that generates videos and images, and multimodal AI technology that works with images, videos, and text.

Apple is said to be spending millions of dollars a day on conversational AI research as training language models requires a lot of hardware. Apple is on track to spend more than $4 billion on AI servers in 2024.

"Ask" for AppleCare Support Advisors

Apple is testing a ChatGPT-style generative AI tool with its AppleCare support employees. Called "Ask," the tool is designed to generate responses to technical questions and provide information from Apple's internal knowledge base to speed up support replies.

The feature is in beta right now. Advisors can rate a provided question as helpful or unhelpful, and can ask up to five follow-up questions per topic. Apple says the Ask tool is useful for solving complex issues, and because it is pulling from Apple's internal knowledge base, Apple has told advisors that the information is factual, traceable, and useful.

AI for Siri

Apple's work on generative AI could eventually be incorporated into its Siri voice assistant. Apple in February 2023 held an AI summit and briefed employees on its large language model work.

Because of the way Siri is built, it may take Apple quite a bit of time to update its database to support new capabilities. Former Siri engineer John Burkey told The New York Times that Siri's "cumbersome design" means that adding new phrases requires rebuilding the Siri database, which can take up to six weeks each time, while more complicated features like search tools can take upwards of a year.

There are also privacy concerns that Apple needs to contend with to bring generative AI capabilities to Siri. Apple has always been more cautious than its competitors, putting privacy ahead of functionality, a decision that has caused Siri to lag behind Alexa, Google Assistant, and other voice-based personal assistant options.

The Information suggests that Apple is aiming to create a feature that would let Siri automate multi-step tasks, automatically performing tasks that are accomplished with Shortcuts today.

According to Bloomberg, Apple is aiming for a smarter version of Siri that's deeply integrated with AI. Apple is planning to update the way that Siri interacts with the Messages app, allowing users to field complex questions and auto-complete sentences more effectively.

Rumors suggest that Siri will have better natural conversation capabilities and improved user personalization. The new functionality will be available across device, so Siri may retain conversation information from one device to another.

AI for Apps

Apple is rumored to be planning to add AI to as many Apple apps as possible. In Apple Music, for example, Apple could use AI to create auto-generated playlists, while in Xcode, AI support could help developers write and troubleshoot code.

In Pages and Keynote, AI could be used for writing and creating slide decks, while Apple's internal customer support apps could be updated with generative AI to assist with AppleCare.

Apple's full generative AI vision will take time to fully scale, so the complete suite of AI features that Apple has planned might not arrive until 2025.

On-Device AI

The first AI features coming to the iPhone with iOS 18 will run entirely on-device using the iPhone's hardware rather than relying on a cloud server. Apple may add new capabilities in the future through a potential partnership, but on-device AI will be the focus to begin with.

News and Publisher Deals

Apple wants to partner with major publishers to get permission to use their content for AI training purposes.

So far, Apple has approached Condé Nast, NBC News, and IAC about possible AI deals. Condé Nast publications include Vogue, Wired, Vanity Fair, Ars Technica, Glamour, The New Yorker, GQ, and more, while IAC owns publications like People, The Spruce, Serious Eats, Martha Stewart Living, Real Simple, Entertainment Weekly, and Better Homes & Gardens.

Proposed deals have been worth at least $50 million, and would al... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Apple GPT: What We Know About Apple's Work on Generative AI
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: u+ive
Apple AI will create photos of people that are taller, better looking, and dress smarter than your more common garden variety AI.

It will create text that makes you sound more intelligent, more well off, and more informed than the lowlife AI used by the peasant class.

You’ll have more dates, more friends, and make more money than the green bubble slumlords.

This is why you will be hated. And this is why they will hate you.

Its tough at the top.
 
TBH Apple are really behind the 8 ball when it comes to AI. I have no doubt they've got the resources, financial and intellectual clout to pull something off.

But they always appear to be several steps behind the other players and there track record with Siri is not good.
 
TBH Apple are really behind the 8 ball when it comes to AI. I have no doubt they've got the resources, financial and intellectual clout to pull something off.

But they always appear to be several steps behind the other players and there track record with Siri is not good.
That depends on what you consider AI though. When it comes to generative language models, absolutely.

What many in the industry are *calling* AI is really machine learning (Apple sticks to this description). iOS 17 is using Transformer machine learning models all over the place. Transformer models are considered the bleeding edge of commercial AI, so they’re not exactly behind in that regard.

 

Attachments

  • IMG_6404.png
    IMG_6404.png
    385.6 KB · Views: 111
I felt this was a very comprehensive summary of the state of AI at Apple. Many people on this forum say that Apple is lagging behind, but it’s helpful to understand their direction, and what they have already done in terms of machine learning in their OSes and products. I don’t feel like Apple needs to jump on the bandwagon and do what everyone is doing in regard to AI, and I hope they won’t. Tools and technology need to enhance people’s lives while still maintaining privacy and user rights.
 
TBH Apple are really behind the 8 ball when it comes to AI. I have no doubt they've got the resources, financial and intellectual clout to pull something off.

But they always appear to be several steps behind the other players and there track record with Siri is not good.

Blame that to Apple stands on user privacy. Siri can only guess what you want, she can't steal that information from your browser. She is not allowed.
 
I don’t understand, the hype cycle on AI-everything has already begun to die down.

Are people looking for Siri to write essays or something?
AI is extremely good at rote regurgitation of information in a more human way. It makes a lot of sense to make Siri smarter by utilizing the neural cores. How often do we all complain out how dumb and behind she is?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
I really think Apple should have made a bigger deal about the fact that the new autocorrect is basically GPT-2. It's better than autocorrect has ever been and I never would have thought that was the solution, but it works really well. Remember way back in 2017 or so, they were afraid to release GPT-2 because they were afraid it was so powerful it would damage society.

I think they are forbidden by corporate policy at the highest levels from acknowledging the existence of ChatGPT specifically and any other company's AI generally, or even the use of the words "AI" or "GPT."

But I am so encouraged by what they did with autocorrect, I wouldn't be surprised to see them next year just put ChatGPT 3.5 or 4 or its equivalent as at least a front-end to Siri. Siri already hears me very well, it's just really stupid about what to do with what it heard. GPT could be a quick stop-gap to Siri, and of course its eventual replacement.
 
Apple AI will create photos of people that are taller, better looking, and dress smarter than your more common garden variety AI.

It will create text that makes you sound more intelligent, more well off, and more informed than the lowlife AI used by the peasant class.

You’ll have more dates, more friends, and make more money than the green bubble slumlords.

This is why you will be hated. And this is why they will hate you.

Its tough at the top.
Then they'll meet in person and it'll all go pear shaped.
 
AI is extremely good at rote regurgitation of information in a more human way. It makes a lot of sense to make Siri smarter by utilizing the neural cores. How often do we all complain out how dumb and behind she is?
They’re already using the neural cores. Gleaning from hints in the intro of iOS 17 it appears that Siri (or components of it) have also made the transformation to a Transformer based model.

I think iOS 18 is going to have a *ton* of machine learning based refinements, but not promoted using the buzzwords that were hyped to the moon and back just a mere months ago.
 
Whoever nails the AI assistant race - I mean really nails it - will lead in hardware, IoT, and [name] store for many many consumers.

Generative AI has its uses, undoubtedly, but a virtual assistant that can understand multiple commands, context of requests, and even anticipate needs on a near human level?! Sign me up.

Watch the movie “Her” and take away all the emotive and self-aware parts (basically keep the first bit of the movie), and you’ll see the ideas which are theoretically/realistically possible; maybe not soon, but the speed at which we’re approaching it is ever-increasing.

I hope it’s Apple - ‘cause I like their hardware and (mostly) polished software - but I’ll jump ship in a heartbeat if someone else makes that breakthrough.

[well, maybe not a heartbeat]
 
Blame that to Apple stands on user privacy. Siri can only guess what you want, she can't steal that information from your browser. She is not allowed.
Actually I don't buy that argument. The fact is over a decade it [the AI] has not evolved.
 
Apple AI will create photos of people that are taller, better looking, and dress smarter than your more common garden variety AI.

It will create text that makes you sound more intelligent, more well off, and more informed than the lowlife AI used by the peasant class.

You’ll have more dates, more friends, and make more money than the green bubble slumlords.

This is why you will be hated. And this is why they will hate you.

Its tough at the top.
Will Apple AI make me appear more environmentally friendly than Tim Cook? :D
 
The problem with most AI is that they are not artificial at all. The output of the AI is programmed to be random, but only within the parameters as set by the programmers.

Things like personal (and other biases and what the programmers consider offensive is taken into account. This makes their attempt at AI totally worthless.

True AI is unpredictable. It might output something the programmers of it do not like or find offensive. It might output the inconvenient truth.

All of the companies listed above,
google, microsoft, amazon and meta, as well as Apple all have strong views on what is offensive and have spent large amounts of money lobbying in areas far outside the scope of their business. Are they even capable of setting aside their biases to create a truly artificial intelligence. Their history says no, they can not. However I am willing to be surprised if the actually do it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.