the plaintiff named his supervisor dan riccio for singling him out and firing him for no good reason, since the plaintiff has an exemplary record, then there might be a lawsuit there
but civil cases may be too high in their dollar amounts
if apple had a good reason to fire the plaintiff, they better let the court know because if they fired him frivolously like the press seems to indicate, they are setting themelves up for a suit they could well lose
of course, the press does not always indicate all the details
HR people who like to bend the rules, which may not be right in the first place all the time, do no service to labor law by creating a wrong to try to "right a wrong"
it is kind of like the hr people who say they don't believe in blacklisting but they use secret language like, "then is that person eligible for rehire?" to see if that person is secretly blacklisted
hr types who use that type of backstabbing sneakiness are the ones who make good companies get sued in the first place...why do you think the dilbert cartoon has catbert, the evil human resources director (there is a lot of truth to that)
even though i got my degree in that field, the practice of hr is a very cutthroat field indeed and i suspect a lot of honest, well meaning people who entered the field in the first place become jaded and become the villains they first set out to fight (kind of like john grisham's characters in his novels about lawyers and the law)
when i visited a law school after finishing college, i remember the law professor telling his class that half of all senior HR people for the fortune 500 have juris doctorate degrees and the law school dean told me on another visit that hr directors often go to law school to "get more knowledge" and not necessarily go for the bar
i am just glad to be a techie and not an hr person/politician, because even if you try to do good as an hr person, people will always question your motives
my 2 cents
[Edited by jefhatfield on 11-11-2001 at 11:03 PM]