Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,191
38,985


Apple executives have been discussing the possibility of the company making a bid to acquire Perplexity AI, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Perplexity is one of the leading AI startups that has proven popular as an AI-infused web search engine.

perplexity-ai-mac.jpg

Mergers and acquisitions chief Adrian Perica, services head Eddy Cue, and other executives overseeing Apple's AI efforts have been participating in the discussions, which Gurman says "are at an early stage and may not lead to an offer." Apple declined to comment, while Perplexity said that it has "no knowledge of any current or future M&A discussions involving Perplexity."

Whether or not Apple makes a bid for Perplexity may hinge on the outcome of the ongoing Google antitrust trial, as Apple's deal with the search engine giant to make Google the default search engine on Apple devices and which brings Apple roughly $20 billion per year could be nullified as part of a ruling against Google.

Perplexity's most recent funding round valued the company at $14 billion, so an outright acquisition by Apple would undoubtedly be by far the largest deal in the Cupertino company's history, topping its $3 billion purchase of Beats over a decade ago.

As an alternative to an acquisition, Apple could instead choose to partner with Perplexity to add its AI search capabilities to Safari and Siri, and the two companies have met multiple times in recent months to discuss Perplexity's technology. Perplexity is, however, said to be close to a far-reaching deal with Samsung to bringing its AI features to the phones of Apple's biggest rival, a move that could complicate any potential deal with Apple.

Article Link: Apple Internally Discussing Whether to Bid to Acquire Perplexity AI
 
Doesn't perplexity rely on ChatGPT/Gemini/Grok? lmao all they're buying is some GUI and some logic for searching the web.

It's also my understanding that Perplexity is just a RAG with web searching capabilities on top of other LLMs like OpenAI/Anthropic/Grok.

I wouldn't be surprised if they've tried tuning Mistral / Llama, but once again it's not their core technology...
 
honestly - I wish they would use their $3T mkt cap to buy OpenAI (estimated value $300-400B) in a stock deal.

It's be good value for Apple shareholders. Everything is being compared to OpenAI in this space.

I've mapped ChatGPT to my iPhone action button and it's my new Siri than can actually do stuff and answer questions.
 


Apple executives have been discussing the possibility of the company making a bid to acquire Perplexity AI, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
....
Whether or not Apple makes a bid for Perplexity may hinge on the outcome of the ongoing Google antitrust trial, as Apple's deal with the search engine giant to make Google the default search engine on Apple devices and which brings Apple roughly $20 billion per year could be nullified as part of a ruling against Google.

Perplexity's most recent funding round valued the company at $14 billion, so an outright acquisition by Apple would undoubtedly be by far the largest deal in the Cupertino company's history, topping its $3 billion purchase of Beats over a decade ago.
...
So if the OoJ thing goes through Apple losses 20B in revenue . Since they are going to loose that much might as well through another $14B on the pile. So now out $34B in revenue. Perplexity search generates how much in ad revenue? Somewhere close to $0.00. So paid $14B for a ad revenue replace that doesn't generate any ad revenue.

OK. So where does Apple make the $34B back? Directly charging people to search the Internet? If Google is free how do they compete???

If there is a $20B 'hole' in the revenue stream another option is to "stop digging an even deeper hole".

If Apple had no "for pay" path for Apple Intelligence then Preplexity might be a replacement for a "Pay to ask the AI cloud expert" web service. But , that isn't a substitute for Google search.









As an alternative to an acquisition, Apple could instead choose to partner with Perplexity to add its AI search capabilities to Safari and Siri, and the two companies have met multiple times in recent months to discuss Perplexity's technology. Perplexity is, however, said to be close to a far-reaching deal with Samsung to bringing its AI features to the phones of Apple's biggest rival, a move that could complicate any potential deal with Apple.

Article Link: Apple Internally Discussing Whether to Bid to Acquire Perplexity AI
 
It’s not just the web search capabilities.. (I actually prefer just to use ChatGPT for that), it’s more capable than that with full access to the system, being able to send emails on your behalf etc.. somewhat strange that they managed to pull that off while Apple is still trying to figure it out on their own devices!!
 
honestly - I wish they would use their $3T mkt cap to buy OpenAI (estimated value $300-400B) in a stock deal.

It's be good value for Apple shareholders. Everything is being compared to OpenAI in this space.

I've mapped ChatGPT to my iPhone action button and it's my new Siri than can actually do stuff and answer questions.
The EU would be screaming ‘ANTICOMPETITIVE’ before the ink dried.
 
honestly - I wish they would use their $3T mkt cap to buy OpenAI (estimated value $300-400B) in a stock deal.

It's be good value for Apple shareholders. Everything is being compared to OpenAI in this space.

That would be a horrible value for stockholders. ( minmally for those looking for dividends ( *cough* Berkshire & crew ). OpenAI's numbers is mainly a hype bubble.

2024 Revenues about $4B ... that is 5 times less that the check Apple collects from Google for leveraging the Apple user base for ads. 2025 projected revenues ... between $7-14B. but OpenAI just bought 'io' for $6B. (i.e., far more than their entire revenue steam last year. Not profits... entire revenue. )

OpenAI is technically a non-profit business. Apple is a for profit business. That is a huge mismatch. ( non-profit is one reason to 'blow' all the revenue on 'io'. They cannot make a profit. So throwing it out the door as fast as it comes in. ) .

So hugely dilute your dividend seeking stockholders shares for no dividen upside on the other side. That is a pretty likely to get a stampede of stockholders heading for the exits.


I've mapped ChatGPT to my iPhone action button and it's my new Siri than can actually do stuff and answer questions.

And Apple paid how much to enable that linkage. Maybe a $1M? You want to pay more than 5-6 orders of magnitude more to get to something they already have working?
 
It certainly would be a better investment than Beats. I believe the purchase of that was for its streaming service, which Apple didn't need to purchase, just build on iTunes. Everything in Beats related in Apple Music has now been replaced, which proves it was pointless. However, I guess Apple made its money back from the headphones, which I don't think was the original intention
 
It certainly would be a better investment than Beats. I believe the purchase of that was for its streaming service, which Apple didn't need to purchase, just build on iTunes. Everything in Beats related in Apple Music has now been replaced, which proves it was pointless. However, I guess Apple made its money back from the headphones, which I don't think was the original intention
Beats was a phenomenally good investment for Apple. It allowed them to quickly enter the music streaming business and stop Spotify from gaining a truly insurmountable market share. (There are tons of parallels to Apple's place in AI right now and where they were with music at the time of the Beats acquisition.) And it gave them a profitable, cross-platform hardware business that's still generating income.
 
Last edited:
Beats was a phenomenally good investment for Apple. It allowed them to quickly enter the music streaming business and stop Spotify from gaining a truly insurmountable market share. (There are tons of parallels to Apple's place in AI right now and where they were with music at the time of the Beats acquisition.) And it gave them a profitable, cross-platform hardware business that's still generating income.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
It certainly would be a better investment than Beats. I believe the purchase of that was for its streaming service, which Apple didn't need to purchase, just build on iTunes. Everything in Beats related in Apple Music has now been replaced, which proves it was pointless. However, I guess Apple made its money back from the headphones, which I don't think was the original intention
They would not have needed the technology, but Beats would most likely have already have had streaming licensing agreements in place with all major labels, so a much quicker route than needing to negotiate from scratch.

Having Dre & Iovine on board as poster boys, alongside their extremely healthy headphones sales at the time and 100k+ pre-subscribed. It looks as though it was a very smart move.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.