Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,712
38,203


A few days ago, we reported that Apple's refurbished Mac mini pricing had a problem, and it appears that Apple has taken note.

m2-pro-mac-mini.jpg

Apple was offering a refurbished Mac mini with the M2 chip, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage for $559, which was $50 more than a refurbished Mac mini with the M4 chip, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. All other key specifications were equal.

That's no longer the case.

As noted by Tech God on X, Apple has since revised its refurbished Mac mini pricing, and the latest prices are quite impressive. In the U.S., you can now get a refurbished Mac mini with the M2 chip, 8GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage for just $319. And the model that previously cost $559 is now priced at $459.

Problem solved.

Article Link: Apple is Now Selling a Refurbished Mac Mini for Just $319 (!)
 
Last edited:
At 2/3 the price of M4 Mac mini, this is an excellent deal. Some people prefer those USB-A ports.

Would 16GB be better? Of course. But for students, seniors, and light users, this is perfectly fine. The tens of millions of 8GB M1/M2/M3 MacBook Airs out there prove that.
 
The 319$ M2 Mini only has 8GB of RAM which is half the amount of new Macs. So it's something that will probably be limited to Sequoia and even that causes compressed memory just upon booting the thing.
I seriously think looking back, the 8 GB base will be considered one of the more anti-consumer things Apple has ever done.

In one year they’ve gone from “8 GB is enough” and “8 GB is like 16 on Windows” to 16 GB is the minimum and practically giving away 8 GB Macs.
 
The 319$ M2 Mini only has 8GB of RAM which is half the amount of new Macs. So it's something that will probably be limited to Sequoia and even that causes compressed memory just upon booting the thing.
Absolutely wild assumption.
Apple introduced a machine with 8 GB of RAM (the M3 MBA) in March 2024.
That computer will absolutely not be limited to Sequoia, in fact, it will probably receive the latest software updates until 2031 at the earliest, with an additional two years of security fixes. That’s nine years.
And by the way? Sequoia supports computers going all the way back to 2017. That was… eight years ago.
 
I seriously think looking back, the 8 GB base will be considered one of the more anti-consumer things Apple has ever done.

In one year they’ve gone from “8 GB is enough” and “8 GB is like 16 on Windows” to 16 GB is the minimum and practically giving away 8 GB Macs.

..because of Apple AI needing a significant amount of of ram. That is the only reason Apple moved it up.
 
I seriously think looking back, the 8 GB base will be considered one of the more anti-consumer things Apple has ever done.

In one year they’ve gone from “8 GB is enough” and “8 GB is like 16 on Windows” to 16 GB is the minimum and practically giving away 8 GB Macs.

Yep - So many of us knew it at the time too ... and were routinely fed the complete nonsense of "special Apple RAM / engineering, etc" -- all bollocks, to no surprise
 
FANTASTIC for server / plex usages

Or a simple computer for basic/normal needs

The whole world does not need, nor want, Apple Intelligence
(whatever that even "is" at this point)
And it’s ironic that you bring that up anyway because… The M2 Mac Mini runs Apple Intelligence just fine.
As does the two years and two months older M1 Mac Mini.
 
I seriously think looking back, the 8 GB base will be considered one of the more anti-consumer things Apple has ever done.

In one year they’ve gone from “8 GB is enough” and “8 GB is like 16 on Windows” to 16 GB is the minimum and practically giving away 8 GB Macs.
It's not anti-consumer. It was simply a matter of different people have different use needs with a Mac. The MR rhetoric of I don't need or want 8GB of RAM, nobody else does, is really getting old. That is essentially what you talking point is.
 
I seriously think looking back, the 8 GB base will be considered one of the more anti-consumer things Apple has ever done.

In one year they’ve gone from “8 GB is enough” and “8 GB is like 16 on Windows” to 16 GB is the minimum and practically giving away 8 GB Macs.
On the contrary, I think the fact that Apple was still selling 8 GB ram in 2024, while absolutely not a very good purchasing decision, at least means Apple will have to optimize macOS for those machines at least until 2031.
If macOS 21 still runs decent enough on 2024 hardware, just like the current macOS15 runs fine on 2018 hardware, means that not only will those 8 GB machines be fine for years to come, but the current 16 GB machines will continue to be optimized as well.
The days of macOS or iOS updates destroying old devices has really been over for quite a while now.
The 2018 Macs still run Sequoia just fine, the iPhone XS and XR with 3GB of RAM still run fine today.
 
I seriously think looking back, the 8 GB base will be considered one of the more anti-consumer things Apple has ever done.

In one year they’ve gone from “8 GB is enough” and “8 GB is like 16 on Windows” to 16 GB is the minimum and practically giving away 8 GB Macs.
That is your opinion and that’s fine. You do seem to forget that not everyone is a power user and those folks are quite happy with that RAM.
 
The 319$ M2 Mini only has 8GB of RAM which is half the amount of new Macs. So it's something that will probably be limited to Sequoia and even that causes compressed memory just upon booting the thing.
It’s $319 though. If a parent is looking for a computer to get their kid to do schoolwork on, this would be a suitable choice.
 
I guess when people hear that 8GB is enough for basic tasks they're thinking about basically browsing, but it's perfectly usable for personal photo and video editing, programming, etc., so it covers 90% of the population.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.