Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,540
39,386



Glass-250x263.png
Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster claims in a note to investors that Apple has a small team working in and exploring the augmented reality field. Munster believes that while augmented reality is still a decade away from broader consumer adoption, Apple is preparing for the next evolution in computing and will be able to offer fashionable wearables that people will actually want to wear.
"While it is limited, we believe Apple has a small team of engineers exploring augmented reality applications. We believe that at the core, the group is likely trying to understand a wearable interface that design would ultimately make fashionable/socially acceptable. At this point, we believe it is difficult to determine if or when these experiments might yield a product."
Google Glass is perhaps the most notable example of a wearable that, while revolutionary in many aspects, created some uncomfortable situations for those wearing the device in public. Glass Explorer Edition was quick to be banned from several public establishments, including movie theaters, casinos, restaurants, hospitals, sports venues, schools, banks and more due to its ability to discreetly take photos and record videos.

Munster remains skeptical about whether Apple's focus on augmented reality will result in a future product, as it is common for the company to research and develop new products and technologies that are never released to the public. Munster also has a less than impressive track record at divulging Apple's upcoming plans, so his predictions should be treated with a proverbial grain of salt.

Apple began allowing developers to release augmented reality apps on the App Store nearly six years ago, such as Google's mystery game Ingress. Apple also began exploring augmented reality for Maps in 2011, corroborated by a March 2014 report claiming that the iPhone maker still plans to add augmented reality features to Maps. Based on Munster's comments, Apple appears to remain interested in the field.

Article Link: Apple Reportedly Has Small Team Working on Augmented Reality Projects
 
iGlasses? lolz #

I hope they figure out a way to make custom sized OLED lenses together with custom frames... ######
 
I look forward to Apple releasing their augmented reality hardware and everyone debating who did it first, who made it popular and who makes the most money off of it.

Oh good times lie ahead, MR.
 
yes! get on it! I love the very concept of AR! So excited for Microsoft HoloLens, The more companies working on this sort of tech the better for all our futures!

Just don't make this "for iPhone only"
 
*shrug*

I would hope/expect that Apple have small teams working on lots of tech projects...

Doesn't mean they will ever see production as an Apple product.
 
I look forward to Apple releasing their augmented reality hardware and everyone debating who did it first, who made it popular and who makes the most money off of it.

Oh good times lie ahead, MR.

I think there are already some who live in an Apple augmented reality. :eek::D
 
Assuming the article is correct... I'm glad they have no intentions of doing anything soon and they aren't aggressively pushing for anything either.

Google released far-to-early in the product development lifecycle, as I believe they are coming to readily admit.

Microsoft has a very interesting product, however both it's strength and weakness is that it is not intended for general every-day use so much as a tool to solve specific problems at both home and work.

It's a space that will likely take another 4 to 5 years to even understand, much-less design a marketable product for.

Patience is a virtue.

Karl P
 
So with Google you are a gl*******. If Apple does the same thing would you be an apphole or an ihole? I don't see them doing a Google glass-type product. Maybe something like a VR headset but not Google Glass.
 
Last edited:
Assuming the article is correct... I'm glad they have no intentions of doing anything soon and they aren't aggressively pushing for anything either.

Google released far-to-early in the product development lifecycle, as I believe they are coming to readily admit.

Microsoft has a very interesting product, however both it's strength and weakness is that it is not intended for general every-day use so much as a tool to solve specific problems at both home and work.

It's a space that will likely take another 4 to 5 years to even understand, much-less design a marketable product for.

Patience is a virtue.

Karl P

Without early releases and taking chances things would seldom get off the ground. There are always pioneers.
 
Assuming the article is correct... I'm glad they have no intentions of doing anything soon and they aren't aggressively pushing for anything either.

Google released far-to-early in the product development lifecycle, as I believe they are coming to readily admit.

Microsoft has a very interesting product, however both it's strength and weakness is that it is not intended for general every-day use so much as a tool to solve specific problems at both home and work.

It's a space that will likely take another 4 to 5 years to even understand, much-less design a marketable product for.

Patience is a virtue.

Karl P

I'm not entirely sure thats true. Microsoft has been showcasing HoloLense in use with Minecraft, implies to me they have more everday uses in mind (whether or not it materializes that way).

And a birdy tells me to expect them to dive full on with the project.
 
A better article would be which company isn't working on an Augmented Reality something these days.
 
First give me a map that gets me where I want to go. Then augment reality all you want.

And a web browser that doesn't crash 22 times a day would be nice. At this point I'd be happy if they could make one for iOS or OSX is both is too much to ask.

They keep spreading the R&D all over the place when their core products are turning to crap.
 
Augmented reality won't be successful if the user has to wear a device on their head. When the day comes that a computerized system could be small enough to be integrated into contact lenses...only then will augmented reality take off.
 
I want Augmented Reality Distortion Field. Would be great for business and product pitches at meetings. :p
 
At a quick glance, seeing an article titled "Apple has team working on…" with a picture of Google Glass next to it just makes me throw up a little in my mouth.
 
Augmented reality won't be successful if the user has to wear a device on their head. When the day comes that a computerized system could be small enough to be integrated into contact lenses...only then will augmented reality take off.

Don't agree.

That's like saying Pong / Space invaders will never be popular until Crysis comes out.
You own, use and enjoy whatever the technology of the day allows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost31
Google released far-to-early in the product development lifecycle, as I believe they are coming to readily admit.

I'd say that Google - by design - lightly stepped into this space knowing they were ahead of any critical mass, it was a tech trial more than anything.

I'm not entirely sure thats true. Microsoft has been showcasing HoloLense in use with Minecraft, implies to me they have more everday uses in mind (whether or not it materializes that way).

And a birdy tells me to expect them to dive full on with the project.

Definitely. We've had conversations with MS, Sony, Oculus, and they are full-steam-ahead. The hardware is looking amazing too: major players and even "smaller" companies building some VR/AR gear that is pretty mind blowing (a number of NDAs prevent any specific disclosure on my part, just think glasses vs. goggles, massively increased rendering power in a highly reduced package size).

If anyone attended GDC this year, it was pretty clear the amount of momentum in the VR space (heading towards consumer adoption).

:cool:
 
Glass Explorer Edition was quick to be banned from several public establishments, including movie theaters, casinos, restaurants, hospitals, sports venues, schools, banks and more due to its ability to discreetly take photos and record videos.

While I understand the sentiment, it is extremely easy to "discreetly" take photos and videos on any phone these days. Put your phone in a chest pocket and add just about any smart watch and there you have it.

Obviously the reason it's banned is because it freaks people out having such a blatant camera visible - it's interesting to me the way so many people/companies justify it...as if nobody ever discreetly takes video with their iPhone...:rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.