Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

GadgetGeek407

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 26, 2009
994
61
florida
This is the first time they completely ignored the current ten iPad 3 to sell it in the current line up and instead are offering the ipad 2 for 399? thats nuts why not offer the 3 for that price? why take out the 3 completely and offer such an old product for 399? who made this decision? so not like apple.
 
Because there is not much difference between the 3 & 4. Selling the 3 at $399 would heavily cannibalize sales of the 4.
 
This is the first time they completely ignored the current ten iPad 3 to sell it in the current line up and instead are offering the ipad 2 for 399? thats nuts why not offer the 3 for that price? why take out the 3 completely and offer such an old product for 399? who made this decision? so not like apple.

The difference between iPad 3 and 4 is too small to make iPad 3 100$ cheaper - people would just go with the 3.gen and save some money if they could. By offering iPad 2 the difference between the models justify the price.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.