Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Hustle

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jul 29, 2007
791
104
USA
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=10463

iPhone faults strike again

companies failed to tell the first iPhone buyers that annual fees of more than $100 would be needed to replace the iPhone battery and maintain service.
AT&T committed fraud by not fully informing customers about the costs and procedures for replacing the battery.

the battery "must" be replaced after 300 charges, anticipating a replacement at one year or less by a qualified technician, since the battery sits inside a sealed compartment.

A similar class-action suit was filed by Jose Trujillo of Melrose Park, Illinois in July.
 
I wonder if I should sue Braun for not informing before I bought my electric shaver that the battery would not last forever, and isn't user-replaceable.
 
Just a nice joint AT&T/Apple offer to refund the money and cancel the contract with a coupon for 20% off on an iPod -- and entered into the AT&T/Apple database as a bad credit risk.

Sort of like the Ford Crown Victoria Interceptor warning, sue us and we won't sell you any cars in the future.
 
Didn't they already do this with the iPod batteries?

It would be interesting to see if the same people who were involved in those lawsuits are involved in this lawsuit.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.