Hello! Quick question - I have a 2010 MPB with an OWC Mercury 240GB (sandforce) SSD. Running out of room, so preparing to upgrade. While I have a 600GB Intel 320 on order for ~$1100, I've been seeing new Apple-branded 512GB Toshiba SSDs selling for about $850. I saw their specs for read/write lined up reasonably close, with the intel having about a 50ms advantage and roughly 15% (90GB) more storage space.
Given that an Apple/Toshiba SSD offers native TRIM support, and sells for about $300 less than the Intel 320 with comparable capacity, I'm actually inclined to cancel my Intel 320 order and go with the Apple-branded SSD.
Warranty length aside, is there any substantial reason (genuinely noticeable slower performance; access time degradation despite TRIM support, etc) that I wouldn't want to pursue an Apple SSD? And for folks with experience with any/all of these drives - can you offer any subjective comments on how well either an Apple/Toshiba SSD or an Intel 320 SSD keep up with an OWC Mercury, which is the only SSD I have experience with to date?
Many thanks for any insight anyone is able to offer!
cheers,
Mark
Given that an Apple/Toshiba SSD offers native TRIM support, and sells for about $300 less than the Intel 320 with comparable capacity, I'm actually inclined to cancel my Intel 320 order and go with the Apple-branded SSD.
Warranty length aside, is there any substantial reason (genuinely noticeable slower performance; access time degradation despite TRIM support, etc) that I wouldn't want to pursue an Apple SSD? And for folks with experience with any/all of these drives - can you offer any subjective comments on how well either an Apple/Toshiba SSD or an Intel 320 SSD keep up with an OWC Mercury, which is the only SSD I have experience with to date?
Many thanks for any insight anyone is able to offer!
cheers,
Mark