Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

thatappleguytoday

macrumors 601
Original poster
Feb 9, 2006
4,162
9,072
Jacksonville, FL
Give me one now Apple - I know you are already thinking this for the next generation :mad:

As much as I can't wait to get my 42mm SS w/ black sport band in a few weeks (in which the band felt amazing), I'm hoping the next gen comes in a plus size watch face just like the iPhone line.

Regardless, still excited about this first run and look forward to what's coming in the future.
 
46mm Is too big imo

I think imo 46mm is too big for apple watch... I have a Hamilton X Copter and it's 46mm I have a small wrist and it's too big but i received it as a gift and love it non the less.
 
My Breitling's that are 46mm are just perfect...I think the Plus should only be compared to a Super Avenger type of scenario.
 
if people, especially women, aren't buying the 38mm sized watch then they just might move the size up a notch.

I'm curious to know what the breakdown of watches sold that are 38mm vs 42mm.
 
For those people with NBA player sized wrists, 46mm Apple Watch might be a pretty good thing indeed.

For everyone else, it will look like a DIESEL saucer (read: cheap junk).
 
Why not just strap on your iPhone to your wrist.

Someone is going to complain a 60mm watch is not big enough, they want a 70mm.

I guess it's amazing the iPad Air doesn't make phone calls, right? I mean, it does have cellular antenna and uses a SIM card.
 
honestly, I think 46mm would make sense for people with thicker wrists.
bigger watches are hugely popular (Rolex DSSD, Panerai, Breitling, Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore, etc) and it makes sense to have multiple sizes for a wristwatch since there are two genders, multiple races and the resulting variation in wrist size is huge .
 
Apple Watch Plus - 46mm

I went in for my try on wearing a 50mm TW Steel and to be honest the 42mm looked tiny in comparison. Yes TW Steel make 'oversized' watches and I have gotten used to them but I really think for larger wrists 46 mm is a better choice. Traditional watch sizes have also crept up over the years with 44mm standard on a lot of premium fashion/mid range luxury watches. The 'small' 42mm size has been the main disappointment for me regarding Apple Watch.
 
Last edited:
That "Inconvenient Truth" article has some interesting opinions about size (he thinks both of the Apple Watches are much too small).

Inconvenient Truth #1:
The Apple Watch Is Really Small

I was shocked at how small and slight the Apple Watch felt on my wrist. I’m a larger guy (6' and built like a linebacker who retired and got a little fat) and when I tried the 42mm Apple Watch Sport on, I thought it was the 38mm. I thought it was tiny and there was some mistake. It is the smallest watch that’s ever been on my wrist.

But wait! The 42mm Apple Watch isn’t that small, right? I mean, it’s 42mm and lots of mens’ watches are around 40–44mm nowadays. Here’s the problem with that, and I think Apple has put a little marketing smoke and mirrors into play here.

Most watches are round. When a manufacturer says that their watch is 42mm, it’s the diameter across the case of the watch. Depending on the exact type of watch, it’s usually 42mm all the way around. However, when Apple says that the Apple Watch is 42mm, they’re measuring it from top-to-bottom. From side-to-side it’s only 35.9mm wide which is tiny in the world of men’s watches and actually closer to a woman’s watch size. Here’s a true-to-scale comparison between the 42mm Apple Watch Sport and some other popular men’s watches.

Most popular men’s watches now are 42mm-46mm measured as a diameter across the watch face. Some watches by Diesel, Guess, Fossil and other “mall stores” are actually much larger, sometimes up to 50mm wide or larger. Bigger watches are very popular now. Unfortunately, the Apple Watch isn’t large at all. Men who are used to wearing 42mm round-faced watches will definitely notice that the 42mm Apple Watch sits smaller on their wrist than they’re accustomed to. Men who are used to wearing 44mm watches (or larger) may think the Apple Watch feels more like a little kid’s bracelet than a substantial and expensive watch.

I was thinking a little more deeply about this size perception issue, and I think one reason that the Apple Watch’s diminutive size struck me is because in all of Apple’s marketing materials it’s portrayed as larger than life. Look at this still from the introduction video.

See how gigantic the digital crown looks? In real life it’s absolutely teeny tiny. I could hardly make out any of the cut-in little ridges when I used an Apple Watch in person. It’s very small and requires precise fingering to turn it while wearing one. Here’s another one from Apple’s website.

These hyper zoomed-in detail shots subconsciously set me up to think the Apple Watch would be big with all tiny details visible. I was very wrong. The watch itself is extremely slight. I wish it was larger, felt heavier on my wrist, and had a larger screen. Maybe that’ll come in a few years.

Here’s a final comparison shot between the Apple Watch and the Motorola 360. The Apple Watch looks absolutely tiny by comparison.

(Note: I couldn't find links for the pics that illustrate this quote, but it's worth going directly to the article to see how they support his point.)
 
^ - I quoted it because he had such strong opinions on size which might be relevant to those interested in this thread's topic. However, I disagreed with almost everything he wrote - - pure clickbait.
 
I'm going to go the extra mile and strap my 27" iMac 5K to my wrist. I'll be able to read MacRumors in ultra high definition everywhere I go!
 
I agree bigger is better!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 212
I was being serious - you guys are just being silly now

The 42mm is a sweet spot (really enjoyed the try on experience and can't wait for it), and I'm not a watch expert, but I personally would like a slightly bigger watch face. If that means 46mm then yes 46.

My main point was I can see Apple making this definitely - an Apple Watch Plus to go with the iPhone line and rumored iPad line.
 
My Breitling's that are 46mm are just perfect...I think the Plus should only be compared to a Super Avenger type of scenario.

Breitlings are round. Square watches are a whole other ballgame. A 46mm square would be HUGE.

----------

I was being serious - you guys are just being silly now

The 42mm is a sweet spot (really enjoyed the try on expIferience and can't wait for it), and I'm not a watch expert, but I personally would like a slightly bigger watch face. If that means 46mm then yes 46.

My main point was I can see Apple making this definitely - an Apple Watch Plus to go with the iPhone line and rumored iPad line.

If the 46mm had more room for battery and thus a better battery life, I would be game.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.