True, but human wrists are so varied in size, they had to accommodate everyone. The same goes for AirPods to a lesser degree.
Personally, I’d love to see a round option. I just think aesthetically it looks better.
But honestly, I doubt it and we’ll likely see minor improvements in battery and perhaps a slimming down in thickness.
And perhaps the introduction of the rumoured rugged outdoorsy version.
I could have been more explicit - "very un-Apple" has more to do with the many styles of band offered (an inevitability, due to the fashion aspect of watches). However, this is not the first time Apple has offered a range of styles/colors.
What's somewhat surprising was the Solo Loop decision (although it seems successful). Traditionally, Apple has offered a "size" range (regardless of product) equivalent to "small, medium, large, and extra-large." Solo Loop sizing is closer to trouser sizing (inch-by-inch increments in waist size and each waist size available in a variety of inseam lengths).
Having two sizes of Watch effectively doubled the number of SKUs (stock keeping units/inventory items) in both complete Watches and accessory bands, but that also seems to have been the right marketing choice.
Introducing a round watch body as an additional option might sell additional Watches. However, it wouldn't be necessary to change anything about the watch bands - the same fastening arrangement and the same band styles could be compatible with both rectangular and round watch bodies.
The whole Apple-like thing is a matter of whether the company is sticking rigidly to the historic Steve Jobs-instituted inventory housecleaning after his return to the company. That moment in history is often interpreted as a permanent decision about the company's future, rather than a pragmatic decision to address the current situation (a company near bankruptcy and far too many products, each selling far too few units).
Yes, Apple continues to favor the "fewer SKUs" side of the consumer goods sector. There are real benefits to keeping a tight rein on SKU proliferation. However, Apple sells enough product that they certainly can produce many SKUs and still maintain their legendary gross profit margins. They seem to do an admirable job of determining when "more choice" will be more profitable and when "less choice" is the right way to go.
When it comes to the original question - is Apple likely to change the watch band fastening arrangement - again, I don't see that changing anytime soon.