Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,005
40,018


Colombia's competition authority has opened a formal antitrust investigation into Apple, alleging that the company has abused its dominant position in the distribution of apps and purchases on iOS and iPadOS.

iOS-App-Store-General-Feature-Desaturated.jpg

The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) announced the probe yesterday (via MobileTime), stating that its Delegation for the Protection of Competition had reached a preliminary conclusion that Apple may have engaged in exclusionary practices that restrict free competition in the Colombian market.

The SIC case is focused on two primary concerns. First, the agency alleges that Apple contractually prevents developers from creating or operating alternative app stores on iPhones and iPads, ensuring that all software distribution takes place exclusively through the App Store. This restriction, regulators say, is designed to exclude potential competitors and preserve Apple's market dominance. The SIC noted that such clauses may amount to an abuse of a dominant position under Colombian law.

The second issue involves Apple's handling of in-app purchases. The SIC said developers are compelled to use Apple's proprietary In-App Purchase system, which applies commissions of 15% to 30% on each transaction. Apple also allegedly prohibits developers from informing users of cheaper alternatives outside the app, a practice known as anti-steering. In its announcement, the agency said these restrictions may result in "unjustified excessive costs" for Colombian consumers and create "artificial barriers" that deter new developers from entering the market.

The investigation will now proceed with evidence collection and analysis of Apple's conduct in Colombia. If the SIC determines that Apple has violated antitrust rules, the company could face sanctions of up to 10% of its turnover in the country, in addition to possible orders to amend its practices.

The Colombian probe reflects the growing international scrutiny of Apple's App Store. Earlier this year, the European Commission fined Apple €500 million under the Digital Markets Act for preventing developers from directing consumers to alternative payment methods. In the United States, a federal court recently found Apple in contempt of a previous antitrust ruling and prohibited the company from collecting commission on certain web-based purchases. Regulators in Brazil, Japan, and South Korea have also pressed the company on similar issues.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple's App Store Under Investigation in Colombia
 
Last edited:
Someday we'll get news like this and instead of comments like "apple should withdraw from that market" or "apple should buy that country", people will start to notice that maybe, just maybe, apple is wrong.
But I believe what’s more likely to happen is Apple and all of its fans point fingers at everyone else but themselves even if the entire world rallies against Apple. You know, pointing fingers at others is always the path of least resistance.
 
Honest question. How many users does Apple have in Colombia?
Apparently 52 million according to Wikipedia. Given the country’s GDP is a little under $20k, I’d say a couple hundred thousands at best. Probably much less than that. To Apple it is closing to rounding error territory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbachandouris
Someday we'll get news like this and instead of comments like "apple should withdraw from that market" or "apple should buy that country", people will start to notice that maybe, just maybe, apple is wrong.
Apple is wrong about what? They've invested billions to build and maintain device hardware, operating system, and cloud infrastructure to make it work. The initial investment, and ongoing investment. So some small company wants to use what Apple built and continues to maintain to make revenue...but they supposedly don't owe Apple anything because? The whole Apple ecosystem is what - a public service? The entitlement never ends....
 
Apple is wrong about what? They've invested billions to build and maintain device hardware, operating system, and cloud infrastructure to make it work. The initial investment, and ongoing investment. So some small company wants to use what Apple built and continues to maintain to make revenue...but they supposedly don't owe Apple anything because? The whole Apple ecosystem is what - a public service? The entitlement never ends....

Unless Apple gives me the hardware, for free, it's not a public service. I paid for the hardware, I own the hardware; not Apple. What I do with it, or install on it, after it leaves their possession should be none of their concern.
 
Apple is wrong about what? They've invested billions to build and maintain device hardware, operating system, and cloud infrastructure to make it work. The initial investment, and ongoing investment. So some small company wants to use what Apple built and continues to maintain to make revenue...but they supposedly don't owe Apple anything because? The whole Apple ecosystem is what - a public service? The entitlement never ends....
Even though it has been explained a thousand times:
Apple forces developers to use its own ecosystem.
The term “sideloading” had to be invented to describe this unique situation

Apple COULD actually offer a service. The App Store as a secure, trustworthy alternative to direct downloads.
But they don't.
Because they DON'T WANT to be customer-friendly or developer-friendly.
They just want to make money. That's why the apps aren't reviewed and every week a game is advertised that only serves to take money out of your pocket as a customer.

Stop telling the same old fairy tales.
Just because Apple has gotten you used to the idea that an App Store is “normal” doesn't mean that it is.
And Apple still provides the best example with its own Mac. There, the App Store is not mandatory.
Because Apple knows full well that they would no longer sell any Macs if they made the App Store mandatory.
Which proves their monopoly position in the smartphone market.

Just like Cook's statement: “Yes, then buy your mother an iPhone. Then she can use iMessage too.”
 
“It’s always someone else’s fault” .. says the company, and its fans, getting targeted by one jurisdiction after another, worldwide.
Why is there fault? Some people want the iPhone to be a little computer (android) and some people want it to be an appliance (Apple). Appliances like the Nintendo Switch have not historically faced this scrutiny but computers do. Some people and govt are trying to force Apple to act like the iPhone is a computer. There is no fault...there is a fundamental disagreement about what is right. The market already has a computer approach. It's sad many jurisdictions are working to take away the appliance approach because I like that alot better. Devs are along for the ride because they see an opportunity to win a fight over money and everyone justifies their position as moral if it means they get the money.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Shirasaki
Yet another government-led shakedown. How much are the Colombians going to charge Apple to keep doing business there?
And another region where Apple’s marketshare is well below 50%. One thing all these regions have in common is the complete inability to drive any local companies to create competing hardware/OS/App Store that they could fully control.

Their assumption is that American designed hardware/software will ALWAYS be available to them. With the current administration, that’s not a given. Any region worried about US companies that’s not working on replacing US companies aren’t getting the big picture.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.