Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,103
40,129



In an in-depth new look at Apple's merger and acquisitions tactics published today by Bloomberg, Apple's "arrogant" culture of deal negotiations is put on display. According to sources who have worked with Apple in M&A, the company struggles repeatedly to pull off big deals "because of a series of quirks," including a refusal to work with investment bankers, inexperience with large takeovers, and an "aversion to risk."

Apple is more interested, and more confident, in building its own services rather than outright purchasing them from a competitor, with occasional exceptions like the 2014 acquisition of Beats and later launch of Apple Music.

tim_cook_hands_raised-800x328.jpg
"The first step in M&A is having some conviction about what it is you want to do," said Eric Risley, managing partner at Architect Partners LLC who has negotiated deals with Apple. "Apple probably more than most feels that they're very capable of building things" rather than buying them, he added. An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
According to analysts and investors, Apple's next big move should be the acquisition of an online video streaming service. The company has began making strides towards beefing up Apple Music's original video content division, with Carpool Karaoke: The Series and Planet of the Apps coming this spring, but analysts believe it needs something "akin to Netflix or Amazon.com Inc.'s Prime Video."

In order to reach a forecast of $50 billion revenue in its services business by 2021, Erick Maronak, chief investment officer at Victory Capital Management, said that the company is "going to have to pursue something bigger than a Beats-like acquisition." This might include other possible "blockbuster" acquisitions like Walt Disney Co. or Tesla Inc, according to Baird analyst William Power.

Netflix is also mentioned multiple times as a logical acquisition target for Apple, with multiple investors and analysts saying the company "needs at least one big acquisition in online video."
But even here, some analysts and investors argue for a big acquisition, especially in online video streaming. Apple has started distributing videos through the Music service, and pooling other providers' video in its mobile TV app, but it has no service akin to Netflix or Amazon.com Inc.'s Prime Video.

On Friday, Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi said Apple needs at least one big acquisition in online video. To reach its $50 billion target, the company must find an extra $13 billion in services revenue over the next four years -- beyond what it can generate itself. Netflix Inc. ended 2016 with sales of less than $9 billion, so even buying that business may not be enough, the analyst said.
Looking behind the scenes at the process Apple goes through to acquire a company, the Apple deals team is said to be made up of around a dozen people and led by Apple's head of M&A Adrian Perica. Most deals "take place at the behest of the company's engineers," so the team meets with Apple engineers who advise them on which potential acquisition targets are attractive and include talented engineers that would add value to Apple.

Its acquisition strategy works well for smaller startups, which it acquires frequently, but the company faces a challenge for bigger deals. Apple refuses to work with investment bankers in an attempt to work directly with the other company's management teams. This results in an air of arrogance, according to Eric Risley, who has negotiated deals with Apple, further stating that "they're used to being able to muscle their way in and get attractive economics."

The company's overall attitude "puts off sellers," as well as its inexperience with integrating larger companies. Some analysts point towards the "lukewarm" launch of Apple Music after the Beats acquisition as proof of this struggle. Still, some investors remain adamant that for Apple to succeed, particularly in its attempts at creating and producing original TV, a big acquisition has to happen soon. Many of those have been pushing Netflix as an attractive target, despite Netflix saying it's not for sale.

Read the rest of Bloomberg's report right here.

Article Link: Apple's 'Arrogance' Impedes Major Acquisitions as Analysts Look to Potential Targets in Online Video
 
Why is it that Apple MUST go into the entertainment and original content industry. They are a technology company.

Purported expert financial and tech analysts place such unwarranted expectations on Apple.

I'm literally waiting for them to say Apple must get into the washing maschine industry. Tim Cook has no idea how to run a company unless he delivers a new touch enabled flying washing machine that delivers crease free clothes at 20 degrees.

Please why don't these fools keep their mouths closed. So tiresome.
 
This is simply the business equivalent of "I'm just not that interested in you" if Apple really wanted to make a deal work they'd get it done"
 
Hopefully Apple goes nowhere near Netflix. All we will get is a "Netflix will be discontinued in 30 days" and then "exciting products in the pipeline".
I think of Google when I think of acquisitions being shut down. Beats is still here, isn't it?

As for exciting products, they've been released -- Watch, TouchBar, AirPods, 9.7 iPad Pro, awesome iPhone 7...all things that were in the pipeline and are exciting to me. Can you define what it is you expect Apple to be releasing?
 
Wait. How would apple be able to afford to buy Walt Disney co?

I believe Disney's market capitalization is somewhere around $150 billion; Netflix's is considerably less. Apple probably has enough cash sitting around to acquire both if it was a priority.
 
Wait. How would apple be able to afford to buy Walt Disney co?
According to what's been reported by various sources Apple has around $250bn that it could use for acquisitions and Walt Disney Co currently has a market capitalisation of around $175bn, so Apple could easily offer a small premium on the current share price to acquire them.

There are also other means of doing a deal if they really wanted to buy Disney. Depends on what they're after, Disney would give Apple a lot of content but Netflix would give some content plus technology at a much lower price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: just.jon
Wait. How would apple be able to afford to buy Walt Disney co?
Apple's current market cap is ~$710bn and Disney's current market cap is ~$175bn. Apple has almost $250bn in "cash", which is largely held overseas; however, this "cash" could potentially be repatriated during the proposed tax holiday to spur such a large acquisition of Disney. Apple could also acquire Disney via both cash and stock, so the company has various "affordable" options to buy the media conglomerate.
 
You guys are funny. Creating imaginary backstories to justify your 'apple is holier than thou' world view.

"Apple refuses to work with investment bankers in an attempt to work directly with the other company's management"

Why go through a middleman when you can go direct? It's not an imaginary back-story, it's directly in the article.

Investment bankers are parasites. They could be replaced with automation and save everyone money.
 
I think of Google when I think of acquisitions being shut down. Beats is still here, isn't it?

As for exciting products, they've been released -- Watch, TouchBar, AirPods, 9.7 iPad Pro, awesome iPhone 7...all things that were in the pipeline and are exciting to me. Can you define what it is you expect Apple to be releasing?
Of course you would say that. Apple can do no wrong in your eyes. How about Apple release professional products and software like they used to? The Touch Bar is a gimmick no matter how you want to spin it, the iPad Pro is an amature machine at best, same with the Mac Book "Pro".
 
  • Like
Reactions: c0ppo and drewyboy
The more and more I read and hear about Apple, it sounds more like an investment company than a product company.

Like something being run primarly by marketing executives, just as Steve Jobs told about in the past.

The focus really seem be off from making great hardware products now. And more on aquisition than actually improving upon the products. We have heard so many things that I would expect to be out right now.

Like their indoor map system that would be integrated into their Maps app. But almost none of it seems to come out at all?
 
I'm a nobody with no real training here but if apple bought disney, they would own ABC and ESPN along with the parks. If they do that, what happens when they try to make a deal with say NBC/Universal? Seems like it might fall under collusion/monopoly situations.
 
I'm a nobody with no real training here but if apple bought disney, they would own ABC and ESPN along with the parks. If they do that, what happens when they try to make a deal with say NBC/Universal? Seems like it might fall under collusion/monopoly situations.
Comcast bought NBCUniversal and AT&T is looking to buy Time Warner. Such vertically integrated deals will have conditions applied to them in order to get approved by the FCC.

The more and more I read and hear about Apple, it sounds more like an investment company than a product company.

Like something being run primarly by marketing executives, just as Steve Jobs told about in the past.

The focus really seem be off from making great hardware products now. And more on aquisition than actually improving upon the products. We have heard so many things that I would expect to be out right now.

Like their indoor map system that would be integrated into their Maps app. But almost none of it seems to come out at all?

Maybe you should invest in Apple? If you did at the beginning of the year, then you would've made a 15% return. Instead of bitching on some random Apple forum about the state of the company, invest in it.
 
I think of Google when I think of acquisitions being shut down. Beats is still here, isn't it?

As for exciting products, they've been released -- Watch, TouchBar, AirPods, 9.7 iPad Pro, awesome iPhone 7...all things that were in the pipeline and are exciting to me. Can you define what it is you expect Apple to be releasing?
I can't help anyone that thinks the TouchBar is "exciting". The touch bar signifies everything wrong with Apple. Junk products not thought out. Think about typing in a word processor. The touch bar gives you suggested words.....but your typing so you are looking at the screen and not the keyboard....sooooo. I tried to type a document with it in the Apple Store and discovered it was quicker to just type and use spell check than use the touch bars auto-correct and recommendations. By something like 3-4x faster. That is a products that solves a problem that nobody had. It also is dim and feels very cheap just like the MacBook Pro it's in. It is just not a good idea or product.
 
The more and more I read and hear about Apple, it sounds more like an investment company than a product company.

Like something being run primarly by marketing executives, just as Steve Jobs told about in the past.

The focus really seem be off from making great hardware products now. And more on aquisition than actually improving upon the products. We have heard so many things that I would expect to be out right now.

Like their indoor map system that would be integrated into their Maps app. But almost none of it seems to come out at all?
Uh, did you actually read this story?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjlawrencejr
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.