Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Original poster
Apr 13, 2010
4,282
6,076
Apple’s position in the AI revolution is nothing short of baffling. Here’s a company with virtually unlimited resources, world-class engineering talent, and a track record of defining how humans interact with technology - yet they’ve been comprehensively outmanoeuvred by the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic in what may be the most important technological shift since the smartphone.
The parallels to Nokia’s downfall are striking and ominous. Just as Nokia optimised for better cameras and more durable hardware whilst Apple and Google reimagined what a phone could be, Apple seems trapped in thinking about AI as merely “making Siri better” rather than recognising that conversational AI represents a fundamental shift in how we’ll interact with computers. Their recent capitulation, integrating ChatGPT into iOS rather than building their own capable assistant feels like a remarkable admission of defeat from a company that typically insists on controlling every aspect of the user experience.

What makes this failure particularly galling is that Apple had all the right pieces. They pioneered consumer Neural Engine processors, have championed on-device processing for privacy, and control an integrated ecosystem that should have been perfect for deploying an intelligent assistant. The blueprint was literally handed to them - everyone wanted Jarvis from Iron Man, and Apple was uniquely positioned to build it. Instead, they’ve spent over a decade delivering a glorified timer that struggles with basic requests whilst their competitors have built genuinely useful AI assistants.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. If conversational AI becomes the primary interface for computing which it increasingly looks like it will, Apple risks being relegated to expensive hardware that people primarily use to access other companies’ AI services. Their entire business model of ecosystem lock in and taking a cut of digital transactions could crumble if the valuable interactions move to AI platforms they don’t control. Unlike their usual strategy of being fashionably late to market, the AI transition is happening so rapidly that by the time Apple delivers a competitive offering, users may have already formed lasting relationships with rival AI assistants.
It’s a bit of a cautionary tale about the dangers of resting on one’s laurels and potentially Apple’s “Nokia moment” in the making.
 
Apple fans didn't help either. Up until a while ago there were people (including tech writers) still saying that Apple was actually ahead in AI. For some people that didn't stop until the updated Siri didn't happen and Apple somewhat admitting that they failed and are behind. I haven't seen the delusional comments for a while now, so that's good. People are not doing Apple any favors by blindly supporting them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cupcakes2000
The general public does not know who makes what so as long as AI homegrown or outsourced is available seamlessly on iPhone, that’s what matter to them.
 
The general public does not know who makes what so as long as AI homegrown or outsourced is available seamlessly on iPhone, that’s what matter to them.
Well, exactly. That’s kind of my point. It’s apple that will suffer in the long term for not being a major player. Their current status as a king of the smartphone and mobile OS industry will suffer unless they pull their finger out.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.