Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

clevin

macrumors G3
Original poster
Aug 6, 2006
9,095
1
http://www.beatnikpad.com/archives/2006/12/24/firefox-2001
high quality as usual, one more better thing than optimized 2.0 build is that now this 2.0.0.1 build use firefox in the UA (it was Bon echo in 2.0 build's ua), this change can solve the issue when websites ID your browser based solely on UA, such as MSNBC.com, now the dynamic menu can be seen.
picture2th8.png

picture3ja1.png
 
These builds are nice but do you find the speed increase noticeable? Just curious. I tend to stick with the official builds
 
These builds are nice but do you find the speed increase noticeable? Just curious. I tend to stick with the official builds

to be honest, i didn't. :D :D :D

I had 2 versions on my machine, stable 2.0.0.1 and a 3.0, 2.0.0.1 is really for use, 3.0 is for excitement. lol, I expect 3.0 to be very different, cairo+aqua is very interesting.
 
I am using 3.0 a lot. It is quite buggy, so I find I am switching to 2.0 or Camino or Safari. DO NOT use it for anything serious, like banking or shopping or anything where bombing out or freezing or screwed up pages will cause you trouble and/or financial distress. :D
 
I am using 3.0 a lot. It is quite buggy, so I find I am switching to 2.0 or Camino or Safari. DO NOT use it for anything serious, like banking or shopping or anything where bombing out or freezing or screwed up pages will cause you trouble and/or financial distress. :D

agree, 3.0 is in alpha phase, by careful when u try it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.