Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,892
39,848


att_416x416-250x250.jpg
Beginning August 1, AT&T will raise its activation/upgrade fee for customers signing up for a one- or two-year contract, alongside introducing a specific activation fee for all AT&T Next and Bring-Your-Own-Phone customers.

According to sources speaking with Droid Life, the new contract upgrade fee will increase from $40 to $45, while the activation cost for Next and BYOP customers will be $15. If true, AT&T will have the highest activation fee amongst its competitors. Other carriers, like Verizon, sit around a $40 upgrade fee cost currently.

With the uptick in price for the carrier's contract activation charges, AT&T is changing its installment plan option, AT&T Next, from a no-cost-to-start service to requiring a $15 activation fee. The same $15 charge will be placed for customers interested in activating a new line of service with the BYOP program, which lets customers save money on their yearly contracts by bringing in a phone purchased elsewhere to avoid paying full-price.

It appears that AT&T will grandfather in existing AT&T Next customers who have a plan with the company prior to August 1, and won't be charged the $15 fee on their next upgrade. However, the carrier noted that this policy is "subject to change," meaning existing Next customers may be facing the $15 charge sometime down the line of their upgrade cycle, if not immediately after the changes take effect.

Article Link: AT&T Activation Fee for Contract Customers Rising to $45, New $15 Fee for 'Next' Customers
 
Last edited:
They are really trying hard to loose me as a customer and to prevent that any new customers sign up .... Guess I am for now grandfathered on the Next plan, but I am sure that won't last long. Guess I have to check out the coverage from T-Mobile in my frequent traveled areas.

For now AT&T is with my family plan and the big discount I get through my company the cheapest option (by a small margin per month, but that adds up) - but I am not willing to support this BS from AT&T for much longer, and price is soon no argument anymore.
 
I was already planning on ditching AT&T for T-Mobile once band 12 iPhones are available (strongly rumored to be in the 6S/6+S phones due out this fall). This only adds to my motivation.
 
When I read this from a European's perspective the first thought I had was how can this happen? Then I looked up average contract costs and I was even more confused. Aren't there four networks that compete? I have three were I live and dozens of MVNOs. Can someone explain to me why mobile is so expensive in the US even with competition? (not trying to be snarky or anything, I actually don't understand).
 
When I read this from a European's perspective the first thought I had was how can this happen? Then I looked up average contract costs and I was even more confused. Aren't there four networks that compete? I have three were I live and dozens of MVNOs. Can someone explain to me why mobile is so expensive in the US even with competition? (not trying to be snarky or anything, I actually don't understand).

My understanding is that carriers here have to build a lot more towers per customer to cover everyone. Whenever you see a US coverage map that shows coverage in the middle of the continent, consider that there are a lot of towers out there in the middle of nowhere covering nobody.

Why?

They're trying to secure government contracts, which require a certain percentage of the country to be covered.

I suspect that part of the reason T-Mobile manages to be so much cheaper is because they're not trying to build useless towers in the middle of nowhere to secure a government contract - they're content with letting AT&T and Verizon compete for those while T-Mobile can more aggressively pursue businesses and individuals.

Also, Sprint is a joke. My understanding is that they aren't based out of the US, and they have little interest in competing in the US anymore. They're trying to sell what they do have to any of the other carriers, and they aren't interested in updating or maintaining what they do have.

So we really have only 3 real carriers, and 2 of them are more interested in government contracts.

Still, our cellular situation is much better than our broadband situation, where the providers each have regional monopolies and seem disinterested in competing with one another. As soon as there's an option to get the channels I want over the internet, I'm ditching Comcast and going cellular only.
 
Good bye AT&T. You are heading in the wrong direction.

Maybe in a couple of years we'll be reading about the deal where T-Mobile is bidding to buy a beleaguered and failing AT&T.

Would be awesome if T-Mobile would buy them in a few years - that would also give them a much better (and needed) coverage area. (coverage is the only thing that I might regret when switching to T-Mobile, but I will check the updated maps)
 
When I read this from a European's perspective the first thought I had was how can this happen? Then I looked up average contract costs and I was even more confused. Aren't there four networks that compete? I have three were I live and dozens of MVNOs. Can someone explain to me why mobile is so expensive in the US even with competition? (not trying to be snarky or anything, I actually don't understand).

They don't really compete here. More like collude.
 
When I read this from a European's perspective the first thought I had was how can this happen? Then I looked up average contract costs and I was even more confused. Aren't there four networks that compete? I have three were I live and dozens of MVNOs. Can someone explain to me why mobile is so expensive in the US even with competition? (not trying to be snarky or anything, I actually don't understand).

Want to be even confused? Look up the costs for wireless in Canada.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mxmgodin
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.