Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Base 16” with only ram and storage bumps?
- Thread starter Abaganov
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Hard to tell.
I configured the base model (6 cores, 5300 GPU with 4GB) to 32GB, 1TB, and it came out to $3,000.
I configured the upgraded model (8 cores, 5500 GPU with 4GB) to 32GB and it came out to $3,200.
You'd get 2 additional cores and upgraded graphics for a relatively small $200 bump.
I configured the base model (6 cores, 5300 GPU with 4GB) to 32GB, 1TB, and it came out to $3,000.
I configured the upgraded model (8 cores, 5500 GPU with 4GB) to 32GB and it came out to $3,200.
You'd get 2 additional cores and upgraded graphics for a relatively small $200 bump.
true but I am also wondering if the i9 will run hotter and louder then the i7?
also I think if I am doing your config I should throw in the extra 100 bucks for the 8gb GPU no?
Last edited:
There’s a MacRumors thread on the i7 vs i9. I think the tldr was that the i9’s are surprisingly better than the i7.
Throwing in the extra $100 would give it better resale value down the line. Although, at that point you’re looking at an extra 300 that you weren’t looking to spend. But on the other hand for $300 extra you get a substantially better machine.
16" MBP Geekbench scores so far show big differences
So I am deliberating between the i9 2.3 and i9 2.4. In theory, the speed bump is < %5, both at nominal speed and full turbo. But early geekbench scores are showing a consistent 10% + difference, both single-core and multi-core...
forums.macrumors.com
I bought a refurb base I7 from Apple for $2,039. I saw a couple video reviews comparing a base model to an upgraded I9. The takeaway was ..."1/2 the cost for 80% or more of the performance." Easy decision for me since I am not a consistent power user.