Where can I find a benchmark test comparing the two macbooks both with 4gb of ram? I'm hoping to find them with both running lion.
Well, you can find geekbench scores out there but as it really only concentrates on a couple of areas it's a very poor indicator of overall system performance.
Xbench which is a much better overall indication of system performance doesn't fully work on Lion yet so the scores you see are skipping some tests and it's not much better than geekbench at the moment.
We know the CPU in the 2011 is about double the raw performance but also that it's GPU is not as strong as that in the 2010. User reports are a mixed bag that are consistent with this. Some claim the 2010 is faster overall and some claim the 2011 is much faster at some things. I expect the result depends on the programs you use the your usage patterns.
From what I've seen so far I'd say that while they may be true on some level, apples claims of 2x or 2.5x performance improvement are Hype and that overall performance improvements are much more modest. Some areas got better and some got worse. So sadly unless you happen to find a benchmark that happens to duplicate your usage patterns it may not be very helpful.
My gut feel offered with no proof is that for most the 2011 is not a compelling upgrade but would be a bit (10-20%) quicker, for some who use the CPU more it would be a more compelling upgrade doing some tasks a lot quicker, and for some who use the GPU more it would be a downgrade. So depending on your usage pattern your choice should likely be different.
I'd disagree. There are two groups of people for whom this isn't a compelling upgrade:
- Gamers (who likely aren't using the MacBook Air anyway)
- People who just browse, check e-mail, etc.
For just about every other task, the CPU makes a significant difference. This is a jump of 2 full CPU generations. People who import from a camera into iPhoto or Aperture, encode video or audio files, use any kind of design application, or who run a virtual machine should notice a marked improvement.
What's the difference between CPU and GPU?
I am also skeptical of the 2-2.5x performance improvement which is why I am seeking concrete numbers.
For various reasons I upgrade my computers pretty much annually. I've seen the 2x CPU speed upgrade quite a number of times over the years and while it sounds impressive, it's largely a yawn because it's only a small part of system performance and it typically results in a 10-20% overall performance improvement.
So maybe we just differ on our definition of compelling. If the 2010 is on the edge of usable for someone the 2011 might make a big difference. But otherwise not that much. I tried a 2011 in an apple store and noticed a modist improvement. There was no oh god this thing flies and I have to have it for me. But usage patterns vary.