Hello all.
I'm an actor/film-maker/musician and home user. My computer needs to be fast and efficient enough to run FinalCutPro, FinalDraft, Cubase, Frontpage, MS Office, Toast/DVD burning, and be quick and easy with the internet (we use cable internet). I need efficiency and the power to use programs like FinalCutPro and Cubase effectively, without huge slow down times while the computer chokes along trying to run the apps.
What I don't use my machine for, is programming or AutoCad/3D or as a server, etc.
I currently have an eMac, purchased about 4 years ago directly from Apple
Machine Model: eMac, Running OS X 10.3.9
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1)
Number Of CPUs: 1
CPU Speed: 1.25 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
Memory: 768 MB
Bus Speed: 167 MHz
Boot ROM Version: 4.8.2f1
I have 2 external drives piggybacked on the machine, so I'm fine with the storage issue. I like it, but I am finding that my eMac is getting slower and slower. And that there are a number of programs that I'd like to use for film editing, DVD burning, etc. that require at least OSX 10.4 or higher, and would do better with a faster more powerful machine. But you add in the starving actor/starving film-maker thing and there isn't the budget to get what I "should" be using.
I plan to upgrade the eMac OS. But I'm wondering if it would be smart for me buy a used G4 from eBay for $300 or $400 that can at least have hardware upgrades (as I have the money to do that), instead of sticking with this all-in-one eMac as my main computer. My film-maker/musician friends all laugh at me for using an eMac for film editing and music editing.
If I were to purchase a PowerMac from eBay, there's one, for instance, priced under $400 that is:
Apple M8570 Power Mac G4 1.25GHz 1GB 80GB DVD-R
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
L3 Cache 1MB SRAM Per Processor
167MHz System Bus
1GB RAM
80GB Hard Drive
DVD-RW/CD-RW
ATI Radeon 9000 Pro w/ 64MB RAM
Tiger 10.4
Tower
Keyboard and mouse
Would something like that be more beneficial to me in the long run?
I don't want a lateral move from eMac to PowerMac; I'd like a faster more efficient machine at a starving film-maker price. Being fairly new to Mac's (the eMac was my first non-PC), I'm not sure how upgradable a PowerMac is and what exactly makes it a better faster machine for my uses. In my mind: more Ram=better; more gHz processor=better (but not even sure what that means, exactly, and if a 1.25 GHz PowerMac can be upgraded or made faster than a 1.25 GHz eMac)
I know this is Pandora's box and that there are no definitive answers. But I'd hate to have it in my mind to buy a PowerMac (or some other desktop version of a Mac), thinking I can do more to speed it up and make my work move faster and more efficiently, just to find out it's been a lateral move or even a move backwards.
Thanks everyone!
Hwfiv
I'm an actor/film-maker/musician and home user. My computer needs to be fast and efficient enough to run FinalCutPro, FinalDraft, Cubase, Frontpage, MS Office, Toast/DVD burning, and be quick and easy with the internet (we use cable internet). I need efficiency and the power to use programs like FinalCutPro and Cubase effectively, without huge slow down times while the computer chokes along trying to run the apps.
What I don't use my machine for, is programming or AutoCad/3D or as a server, etc.
I currently have an eMac, purchased about 4 years ago directly from Apple
Machine Model: eMac, Running OS X 10.3.9
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1)
Number Of CPUs: 1
CPU Speed: 1.25 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
Memory: 768 MB
Bus Speed: 167 MHz
Boot ROM Version: 4.8.2f1
I have 2 external drives piggybacked on the machine, so I'm fine with the storage issue. I like it, but I am finding that my eMac is getting slower and slower. And that there are a number of programs that I'd like to use for film editing, DVD burning, etc. that require at least OSX 10.4 or higher, and would do better with a faster more powerful machine. But you add in the starving actor/starving film-maker thing and there isn't the budget to get what I "should" be using.
I plan to upgrade the eMac OS. But I'm wondering if it would be smart for me buy a used G4 from eBay for $300 or $400 that can at least have hardware upgrades (as I have the money to do that), instead of sticking with this all-in-one eMac as my main computer. My film-maker/musician friends all laugh at me for using an eMac for film editing and music editing.
If I were to purchase a PowerMac from eBay, there's one, for instance, priced under $400 that is:
Apple M8570 Power Mac G4 1.25GHz 1GB 80GB DVD-R
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
L3 Cache 1MB SRAM Per Processor
167MHz System Bus
1GB RAM
80GB Hard Drive
DVD-RW/CD-RW
ATI Radeon 9000 Pro w/ 64MB RAM
Tiger 10.4
Tower
Keyboard and mouse
Would something like that be more beneficial to me in the long run?
I don't want a lateral move from eMac to PowerMac; I'd like a faster more efficient machine at a starving film-maker price. Being fairly new to Mac's (the eMac was my first non-PC), I'm not sure how upgradable a PowerMac is and what exactly makes it a better faster machine for my uses. In my mind: more Ram=better; more gHz processor=better (but not even sure what that means, exactly, and if a 1.25 GHz PowerMac can be upgraded or made faster than a 1.25 GHz eMac)
I know this is Pandora's box and that there are no definitive answers. But I'd hate to have it in my mind to buy a PowerMac (or some other desktop version of a Mac), thinking I can do more to speed it up and make my work move faster and more efficiently, just to find out it's been a lateral move or even a move backwards.
Thanks everyone!
Hwfiv