wdlove said:
It's a good use of confiscated property. Since they were fakes, they would have flaws and not be like the real thing.
You'd be surprised at how good fakes are. The fake bags from Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China, for example, aren't your average Tijuana specials. They're very hard to discern from the real thing. Has anyone seen the fake Callaway golf clubs from China? Take a real good luck. Swing the driver even. They're almost identical to the real ones made here.
Further, no consumer who buys fake clothing or accessories gets burned; the fakes are not marketed as real stuff. They're marketed as fakes, priced substantially cheaper than reals. The ones who get cheated are the trademark owners, manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of the real stuff when people buy the fake stuff instead.
On the other hand, most people who buy fake stuff were never in the market for real stuff anyway. If you can afford and covet a 2000 dollar italian suit, you probably value the retail experience and authenticity of the real thing. If not, then you were never really in the market for the 2000 suit anyway.
so 1. the fakes seem very real to most people 2.they're priced as fakes, not as reals 3. people who buy fakes would never have bought reals anyway, so trademark owners aren't really burned