blogs about the iPhone from 2007

[unlimitedx]

What a silly article, now that we read back upon it!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aRelVKWbMAv0

 

[RagnarokRed]

As soon as I read the title of that article, I thought "haha that's cute.."

 

[iCheddar]

My favorite:

Lastly, the iPhone is a defensive product. It is mainly designed to protect the iPod, which is coming under attack from mobile manufacturers adding music players to their handsets.

In the words of James May: Oh Cock!

 

[haruhiko]

I don't blame the author to say that in 2007, but what's more hilarious is that some people are still saying that NOW.

 

[aleni]

HAHA! please guys help me, email to matthewlynn@bloomberg.net

and put this under subject "Apple iPhone Will Fail in a Late, Defensive Move: Matthew Lynn"

and then in the message, type "ALL RIGHT BRO!"

let's piss this lousy guy. 10-20 emails like this will sure make his day

 

[Kadin]

The iPhone is nothing more than a luxury bauble that will appeal to a few gadget freaks. In terms of its impact on the industry, the iPhone is less relevant.

I think they made a bad prediction with this one...

 

[Reach9]

Can't wait to see what blogs say about the 2011 iPhone

 

[Mr. Incredible]

This part me made laugh, " The big competitors in the mobile-phone industry such as Nokia Oyj and Motorola Inc. won't be whispering nervously into their clamshells over a new threat to their business."

^lmao.

 

[aleni]

come on guys, email the guy

 

[iCheddar]

I didn't email him a troll question, but I did email him a link to the article and asked him what his current thoughts on iPhone were.

 

[ajohnson253]

I think they made a bad prediction with this one...

That's when I stopped reading

 

[Interstella5555]

come on guys, email the guy

For an article he wrote 4 years ago? Yeah, seems real productive.

 

[0309385]

As soon as I read the title of that article, I thought "haha that's cute.."

Same here man.

Great minds think alike

 

[Small White Car]

I don't blame the author to say that in 2007, but what's more hilarious is that some people are still saying that NOW.

Actually, we CAN blame him for saying it in 2007.

Don't get me wrong, there were reasonable people who thought the iPhone would fail back then. We can give them a pass if they laid out a logical argument.

But this article uses the old 'it's not a company, it's a cult' line right up front. So, yeah, when he's gonna start off an article by proving he's an idiot...it's fair to call him an idiot.

No matter what year it is.