Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Both iPhone 17 Pro Models Rumored to Feature Three 48MP Cameras

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,618
38,026


Both the iPhone 17 Pro and the iPhone 17 Pro Max will feature an upgraded 48-megapixel Tetraprism camera, making them the first iPhone models to have a rear camera system entirely made up of 48-megapixel lenses, claims a new rumor out of China.

iPhone-17-Pro-Dual-Tone-Horizontal-Single-Feature.jpg

According to the Weibo account Digital Chat Station, the iPhone 17 Pro camera specs will include a 1/1.3" 48MP Fusion lens, a 48MP Ultra Wide lens, and a new upgraded 48MP Tetraprism telephoto lens (up from 12MP on the iPhone 16 Pro models). Both the main and telephoto cameras are said to be hybrid glass-plastic lenses. Meanwhile on the front, both Pro models will feature a 24MP front camera, said the leaker.

The claim lines up with a prediction made by Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. In a June 2024 report, Kuo said the iPhone 17 Pro Max will feature an upgraded 48MP Tetraprism camera for enhanced photo quality and zoom functionality. Kuo said he was uncertain whether only the iPhone 17 Pro Max will feature the upgraded Tetraprism camera, but today's rumor indicates that both Pro models will get the upgrade. The new camera requires all-new designed prisms, which must have a shorter form factor to reduce the camera's height, according to Kuo.

Today's rumor also corroborates Apple analyst Jeff Pu's claim in August that all four iPhone 17 models will feature an upgraded 24-megapixel front-facing camera. By comparison, all iPhone 16 models have a 12-megapixel front camera. Kuo also last year claimed that at least one iPhone 17 model would be equipped with a 24-megapixel front camera with a six-piece lens, so this upgrade has now been rumored by multiple sources, making it more likely. Kuo said these changes will "significantly improve the image quality" and low-light performance.

iPhone 17 models are expected to launch in September 2025. Apple is rumored to be introducing a new four-model lineup that drops the iPhone "Plus" model in favor of a slimmer device that we are provisionally calling "iPhone 17 Air," while the iPhone 17 Pro models are said to have a totally redesigned half-aluminum, half-glass back cover with a new rectangular camera module that could result in a smaller main camera sensor being used.

Article Link: Both iPhone 17 Pro Models Rumored to Feature Three 48MP Cameras
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2025/01/10/both-iphone-17-pro-models-three-48mp-cameras/
Last edited:
Nice iPhone pixel pro. If the technical specifications are on par with competitors it might be a nice upgrade. Hope iOS 19 will not ruin the party and is a massive stable upgrade with intelligent Siri.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
DickieSmith said:
The first render MacRumors have used that I don't hate.

Not a particularly attractive design, but not downright ugly like many of the previous ones.
Click to expand...
It does scream 'Pixel 9' though, which I think is a lovely bit of kit but do Apple want to be seen as copying another company so blatently? Doesn't exactly scream cutting edge of product design does it?

Apple, being seen by many as the 'default' are used to dictating the minutae of the phone market. You only have to look at how prevailant flat edges became after the iPhone 12 revamp. It would certainly be an interesting turn of events if they quietly secede that throne to Google :oops:

It would be an interesting year if Apple launch a 17 lineup with a Pixel 9-esque camera strip and Google nearly all but eliminate the thing altogether
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarpalMac, v0lume4, 9081094 and 2 others
Is that a good setup for filming landscape spatial video? Or has that gone down the priority list since Vision Pro kinda flopped?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
I'm sure the single sapphire piece makes manufacturing easier, but now it seems like a more likely failure point. The small spheres at least mean less moment force can be applied.

It appears I will continue to be frustrated by the protruding cameras in either case.
 
ToomeyND said:
I'm sure the single sapphire piece makes manufacturing easier, but now it seems like a more likely failure point. The small spheres at least mean less moment force can be applied.

It appears I will continue to be frustrated by the protruding cameras in either case.
Click to expand...
With this design you could easily use the aluminium top section to reinforce the sapphire, but given these renders are pure speculation and this is the first one with the single sapphire panel (which I like much more than the individual circles) I won't be holding my breath that they'll go down this route.
 
Ctrlos said:
It does scream 'Pixel 9' though, which I think is a lovely bit of kit but do Apple want to be seen as copying another company so blatently? Doesn't exactly scream cutting edge of product design does it?
Click to expand...

The Pixel 9 is more recognisable, but this is similar to the iPad Pro camera bump from 2018 where the metal back curves up surrounding black glass.

The things that make it look a little extra Pixel 9 are that we aren't used to seeing the iPhone cameras lined up this way, and we haven't seen a mixed materials back to an iPhone since the iPhone 5s.
 
Why do we need three 48MP cameras on our phone?

Is it because iPhone users demand high resolution, memory-hogging pictures by default?

Is it because users want to use the iPhone in lieu of traditional, professional cameras to make movies?

Won't we eventually reach a point where the phone's stability will limit how amazing that picture of a blade a grass 100 yards away will look?

No really. Do we need it?
 

Attachments

  • image-2.jpg
    image-2.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 40
  • Like
Reactions: iMac The Knife
Not sure how this awful render got so common but there’s no way this happens
They literally redesigned the standard 16 just so it can capture spacial content, there’s no way they abandon it on the Pro next year.
The news is great though, that means we get a digital 10x zoom lens ideally :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: r_123
The ultra wide is terrible quality not the same as main one even being 48mb also it’s a lie it’s not 48mb that’s a huge lie in a camera phone it’s impossible
 
I simply don't understand why 48MP camera phones are even a thing. Due to the physical limitations in sensor and lens size, the effective resolution will probably be close to 12-16MP even though the box says 48MP. Add to this that having smaller pixels (because you're putting more MP in the same size sensor) will introduce more noise and less dynamic range because each pixel collects less light compared to a sensor with fewer MP. It seems to me that this is almost entirely a marketing scam; one that actually results in a worse product:
  • More noisy pixels
  • Less dynamic range
  • Larger image sizes (in terms of storage)
  • More processing power required
  • No added image detail over lower-megapixel sensors due to diffraction limits in such a small lens.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: ZZ9pluralZalpha, Polinsky, souko and 8 others
DickieSmith said:
The Pixel 9 is more recognisable, but this is similar to the iPad Pro camera bump from 2018 where the metal back curves up surrounding black glass.

The things that make it look a little extra Pixel 9 are that we aren't used to seeing the iPhone cameras lined up this way, and we haven't seen a mixed materials back to an iPhone since the iPhone 5s.
Click to expand...
I hope we get a camera setup like the iPad Pro. I hadn't really noticed it before but it does look a lot nicer than the current iPhone one.
 
Kylo83 said:
megapixels mean nothing it’s about the sensor size, it’s all marketing the mp number. My dslr canon 5D mark iv is not 48mp but it’s a million times better image quality with any crop
Click to expand...
I have a 26MP Fujifilm. Even _talking_ about comparing the images of the Fujifilm with those of an iPhone is borderline insulting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saturn007, CarAnalogy, iMac The Knife and 1 other person
martinlk said:
I simply don't understand why 48MP camera phones are even a thing. Due to the physical limitation in sensor and lens size, the effective resolution will be probably close to 12-16MP even though the box says 48MP. Add to this that having smaller pixels (because you're putting more MP in the same size sensor) will introduce more noise and less dynamic range because each pixel collects less light compared to a sensor with fewer MP. It seems to me that this is almost entirely a marketing scam; one that actually results in a worse product:
  • More noisy pixels
  • Less dynamic range
  • Larger image sizes (in terms of storage)
  • More processing power required
  • No added image quality over lower-megapixel sensors
Click to expand...
Its mainly for better Quad Bayer image stacking. For a 14mpx image the sensor is using 16 pixels-per-pixel or thereabouts. On an S24 Ultra, the 12mpx stacked images are much better than the unprocessed 200mpx images from the main sensor because the algorithms have more data to work with. With pixel-binning you have more light hitting the pixels because each one is 'bigger'.

You also have better digital zoom range when transitioning between lenses. If you need to shoot at 3.8x or 5.4x then that extra image data makes up for the lack of a proper optical zoom. Telemacro has improved performance due to the Ultrawide having a 'zoom' range without resorting to the 5x lens

In general what you're seeing is more flexibility. For most people, their phone is their camera and so it has to fit all sorts of scenarios. The processing is much of a muchness, with top of the line A-series and Snapdragon chipsets being almost too much for what a phone gets used for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zakarhino, ZZ9pluralZalpha, r_123 and 1 other person
Ctrlos said:
You also have better digital zoom range when transitioning between lenses. If you need to shoot at 3.8x or 5.4x then that extra image data makes up for the lack of a proper optical zoom. Telemacro has improved performance due to the Ultrawide having a 'zoom' range without resorting to the 5x lens
Click to expand...
Yes, but if diffraction is limiting the resolution of the lens then the digital zoom really doesn't benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee and Saturn007
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back