G'day,
I remember as a kid in the early 90's being able to ask for a cup of water at fast food outlets, and not paying a cent... Then along came bottled water en masse - not just the Perrier's - and getting a free cup of water became a thing of the past, as they'd instead sell you a bottle...
My question is...
Is the cost of bottled water artificially high, so as to make it less appealing compared to soft drinks? And if so, is Coca Cola Co behind this conspiracy?
I am sure that when bottled waters really took off, and I am talking plain simple water, no additives etc, the cost was substantially less than a soft drink - perhaps 2/3 the cost or less. And fair enough - why would a bottle of water cost more or the same as a soft drink, which contains water, that has been carbonated, sugar, and other flavours?
Surely these products could not cost the same in terms of raw materials, production volumes, and advertising... Indeed - when was the last time you saw an ad on the tv for bottled water? How many Coke ads have you seen in the past week?
Yet, these days especially at particular fast food outlets (ie the majors, McDonalds, KCF, Burger King, etc) buying a bottle of water costs the same as a soft drink does. Most vending machines seem to follow the same trend.
Looking online, it appears Coca Cola sells at least 1 plain bottled water product in most if not all of their global markets... Diversification... Or an attempt to ensure that they have some control over the cost of bottled water? Because by selling bottled water at prices similar to that of Coca Cola, what will people choose to buy? Plain water... Or sugary addictive goodness?
Can anyone else recall whether bottled water used to have a lower price tag? Is this phenomena actually localised in Australia? What do you think of this wacky conspiracy theory?
cheers
cosmic
I remember as a kid in the early 90's being able to ask for a cup of water at fast food outlets, and not paying a cent... Then along came bottled water en masse - not just the Perrier's - and getting a free cup of water became a thing of the past, as they'd instead sell you a bottle...
My question is...
Is the cost of bottled water artificially high, so as to make it less appealing compared to soft drinks? And if so, is Coca Cola Co behind this conspiracy?
I am sure that when bottled waters really took off, and I am talking plain simple water, no additives etc, the cost was substantially less than a soft drink - perhaps 2/3 the cost or less. And fair enough - why would a bottle of water cost more or the same as a soft drink, which contains water, that has been carbonated, sugar, and other flavours?
Surely these products could not cost the same in terms of raw materials, production volumes, and advertising... Indeed - when was the last time you saw an ad on the tv for bottled water? How many Coke ads have you seen in the past week?
Yet, these days especially at particular fast food outlets (ie the majors, McDonalds, KCF, Burger King, etc) buying a bottle of water costs the same as a soft drink does. Most vending machines seem to follow the same trend.
Looking online, it appears Coca Cola sells at least 1 plain bottled water product in most if not all of their global markets... Diversification... Or an attempt to ensure that they have some control over the cost of bottled water? Because by selling bottled water at prices similar to that of Coca Cola, what will people choose to buy? Plain water... Or sugary addictive goodness?
Can anyone else recall whether bottled water used to have a lower price tag? Is this phenomena actually localised in Australia? What do you think of this wacky conspiracy theory?
cheers
cosmic