I've been testing my new setup rMBP with Logic Pro and multi-track drum editing, so I did some testing.
Editing on the usb2.0 or fw800 was just awful, even play/stop response is vomit-inducing slow.
Internal drive isn't all that big, but I copied the project over and tried it there. Transient analysis, overall response much better. 450mb/s.
I then wondered if I would benefit from a faster drive... Meaning cMBP dual SSD raid0 setup for even more snapiness.
So I created an 8GB RAMDrive and tested it real-life. The SSD jump from FW800/USB2.0 or even internal Raid0 HDD (tested on my cMBP) means instead of waiting 10secs for enabling/disabling quantization track to 1sec.
Using RAMDrive instead of SSD means waiting 0.5sec, and project doesn't load any faster. (its already instant with single SSD)
That leads me to believe I actually benefit more from random access time than actual bandwidth in practice when working with my projects.
Also actual bandwidth used isn't more than 2-6 MB/s.
As far as I know random access times go haywire when doing an SSD RAID0...
In this particular case, would I see worse performance going RAID0? (>> no buyers remorse if true)
Also, I'm waiting patiently for this:
https://thunderbolttechnology.net/product/delock-pa121542513
Can I hope to get the same Random Access Times as from internal sata?
I didn't know all this when I ordered, otherwise I'm pretty happy with my retina.
Thanks.
btw, if someone wants I can upload a simple RamDrive script I whipped together.
Editing on the usb2.0 or fw800 was just awful, even play/stop response is vomit-inducing slow.
Internal drive isn't all that big, but I copied the project over and tried it there. Transient analysis, overall response much better. 450mb/s.
I then wondered if I would benefit from a faster drive... Meaning cMBP dual SSD raid0 setup for even more snapiness.
So I created an 8GB RAMDrive and tested it real-life. The SSD jump from FW800/USB2.0 or even internal Raid0 HDD (tested on my cMBP) means instead of waiting 10secs for enabling/disabling quantization track to 1sec.
Using RAMDrive instead of SSD means waiting 0.5sec, and project doesn't load any faster. (its already instant with single SSD)
That leads me to believe I actually benefit more from random access time than actual bandwidth in practice when working with my projects.
Also actual bandwidth used isn't more than 2-6 MB/s.
As far as I know random access times go haywire when doing an SSD RAID0...
In this particular case, would I see worse performance going RAID0? (>> no buyers remorse if true)
Also, I'm waiting patiently for this:
https://thunderbolttechnology.net/product/delock-pa121542513
Can I hope to get the same Random Access Times as from internal sata?
I didn't know all this when I ordered, otherwise I'm pretty happy with my retina.
Thanks.
btw, if someone wants I can upload a simple RamDrive script I whipped together.