Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

EcranBleu

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 27, 2014
18
11
Hello,

After the recent bump in storage, I have decided to get a Mac Mini to replace a MacBook Pro 13" 2012 (Dual core i7) with 16GB of RAM.

Based on the new pricing, I am wondering what the best option for my workload is:

Option 1:
6-core i5, 1TB SSD, 8GB RAM: $1,299

Option 2:
6-core i7, 512GB SSD, 8GB RAM: 1,299

I will buy 32GB either way from a third party.

My typical workload:
Development with IntelliJ & PyCharm, 3+ Docker containers, MS Office 2016 and many Browser tabs/Windows. Sometimes, a Virtual Machine to run Linux for testing.

Both CPU and SSD are not upgradeable in this machine. Is the Hyper threading in the i7 CPU worth the extra $200 or should I spend the money on a larger SSD instead?

Thanks.
 
I would vote for the CPU because you can always use an external TB3 drive. Of course I have no clue on how much space you're using now or what your storage needs are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: velocityg4 and djc6
I would vote for option #2 for same reason as russell_314

If you are going to run VMs, hyperthreading on i7 processor will help (i5 doesn't have hyperthreading). You can never upgrade processor post-purchase, you can upgrade RAM, you can add additional external storage.

I went from a 2011 to 2018 mac mini because none of the upgrades in the intervening years were worth it - who knows how long you'll keep 2020 with Apple's super long update cycles. Two years and all we got was a price decrease on SSD - no other changes between 2018-2020 :(
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: velocityg4
Geekbench 5 scores for single core performance aren’t that different for the i5 and i7. About 10% difference. Multi-core shows about 20% difference. Rule of thumb I used years ago was that it took a 20% increase in processor speed to see a noticeable difference.

In my experience most people are not cpu bound. They would benefit more from memory or disk space. On a laptop I would argue strongly for more disk space since external is a pain but less so on the Mini.
 
Geekbench 5 scores for single core performance aren’t that different for the i5 and i7. About 10% difference. Multi-core shows about 20% difference. Rule of thumb I used years ago was that it took a 20% increase in processor speed to see a noticeable difference.

In my experience most people are not cpu bound. They would benefit more from memory or disk space. On a laptop I would argue strongly for more disk space since external is a pain but less so on the Mini.
I agree with this. Option 3 could be get an i5 and just save the $$$. Unless you're using the mini for portable use or have some OCD about cables, an external drive isn't really an issue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.