Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Chodite

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 23, 2007
586
0
Baltimore, MD
Mostly casual use. Though importing, editing, exporting a fair amount of raw 1080p HD footage (mostly via iMovie) as well as iPhoto editing. Outside of that, mainly web browsing, Torrents, etc. Must choose just one upgrade for this new 13" MBP: SSD or i7?
 
Hrm that's a tough call. The video editing and ripping would definitely be benefited by the i7, but overall experience would go to the ssd. I would probably vote for the ssd.
 
i7 easy. you can always put your own ssd in later.

True. Though honestly, the last thing I want to do is install a new SSD into this thing, after reading other posts in here... partitioning issues and such. Would much rather have it factory installed!
 
Mostly casual use. Though importing, editing, exporting a fair amount of raw 1080p HD footage (mostly via iMovie) as well as iPhoto editing. Outside of that, mainly web browsing, Torrents, etc. Must choose just one upgrade for this new 13" MBP: SSD or i7?

True, but not by much at all. Not enough or me to justify the extra $300. I say SSD.

Handbrake encoding results
 
True. Though honestly, the last thing I want to do is install a new SSD into this thing, after reading other posts in here... partitioning issues and such. Would much rather have it factory installed!


Uhm...

1)Buy SSD
2)Pop cover off and take out Hard Drive (easy)
3)Put SSD in.
4)Cover back on and boot up with DVD in drive.

I don't know what your talking about, partitioning issues and all that. Thats nonsense, putting an ssd in and booting from the OS dvd is flawless. Get an i7, and later pop an SSD in and see how your chip will make OSX its *&^%. Load most programs in a half sec, and 2 sec shut downs and 15 second or less startups. I'd call that worth the headache of an hour install.

Youtube and Google are your friends.
 
SSD.

unless you're transcoding videos 10 hours/day, SSD is something you'll appreciate every second of every day you're at your computer.
 
SS ****ing D. No ****ing contest. The difference from i7 is negligible compared to the speed increase from the SSD.
 
I'm kind of in the same boat as OP, here are some of my thoughts:

(Assuming the SSD is from Apple BTO)
- The difference in performance is much more noticeable with SSD than with i7
- The SSD option has a much lower storage capacity
- I can always get an SSD in the future, but I can't just buy an i7 CPU and replace the old one
- That said, the Apple SSD should be more compatible with OS X than other brands

Generally speaking ,the SSD option should give me more performance improvements. The i7 option is more suitable if I plan to do upgrades in the future, but since I will most likely get a new computer in ~2 years, this is not applicable.

My conclusion is that i5 is enough for me (and possibly the OP). The remaining questions are:

- Which SSD to get? (Apple or aftermarket)
- Optibay for SSD or the OEM HDD?

I'm leaning towards the setup of getting the stock MBP with 5400rpm drive, then purchase an SSD myself. I still can't find a straight answer to whether it's better to keep the HDD in its place and put the SSD in Optibay, or vice versa. Assuming I'm booting from the SSD, I have the following 2 scenarios:

HDD in its place, SSD in Optibay:
The HDD gets sudden motion sensor support, but the SSD might suffer from hibernation issues.

HDD in Optibay, SSD in the original drive bracket:
No hibernation issues, but HDD gets no sudden motion sensor support.

Other concerns include where to put the Win7 bootcamp partition, and the home folder.
 
I'm now leaning more towards the processor (i7) upgrade and getting an SSD down the road. An SSD should be cheaper later this year. Much easier to later upgrade the HDD than to upgrade the processor. If I plan on keeping this MBP for at least 3-4 years, I'd like the fastest processor possible.
 
There are way too many SSD heros here, they don't realize that you cannot upgrade your processor once you get it. If you get the i5, you are stuck with it. Get the i7 now, enjoy it very much, and then when you feel like you need an ssd when it becomes more cheaper, get it. It is a very simple concept.
 
I'm now leaning more towards the processor (i7) upgrade and getting an SSD down the road. An SSD should be cheaper later this year. Much easier to later upgrade the HDD than to upgrade the processor. If I plan on keeping this MBP for at least 3-4 years, I'd like the fastest processor possible.

Yep, this pretty much /thread.

The activities that you mentioned will benefit a lot from the upgraded processor, which doesn't really justify getting a SSD at this point of time.

I would say... SSD is a want, and your processor upgrade is probably a need (i.e. the main purpose for the machine).
 
Get the i7. But an SSD in down the road yourself, and maybe when they become a little cheaper you'll get more capacity for your money too.
 
You can add SSD later, so I would say i7.

But, you won't see that much of difference...

I would personally go with SSD.

Actually, I would upgrade both.
 
i7 now and SSD later. Probably better to wait for SSD prices to drop a little anyway.
 
Mostly casual use. Though importing, editing, exporting a fair amount of raw 1080p HD footage (mostly via iMovie) as well as iPhoto editing. Outside of that, mainly web browsing, Torrents, etc. Must choose just one upgrade for this new 13" MBP: SSD or i7?

with what you told me you do. SSD WITHOUT A FACT. you most DEF do not need the i7.. hell you could use the core 2 duo with what you do and the ssd would blow away with speed still. do no think about the i7. GO SOLID MATEE!
 
You can add SSD later, so I would say i7.

But, you won't see that much of difference...

I would personally go with SSD.

Actually, I would upgrade both.

100% pointless post lmfao it was funny though
 
Buy the SSD. Absolutely no doubt about it. Or do neither and save that money for the next complete machine that will be faster than this one across the board in the not-so-distant future.

"Future proofing" never works. I learned that lesson the hard way when I bought a bleeding edge first generation DDR motherboard (about ten years ago) on the assumption that I could just drop a new processor into it a few years later and stay near the cutting edge with minimal cost and effort. What actually happened? Well, we do know (obviously) that the industry at large did in fact adopt the DDR standard going forward. The problem was that by the time I actually needed/wanted that upgrade, the processors and RAM available were already considerably more advanced than what my motherboard could effectively support. I ended up scrapping the entire system core and starting from scratch once again.

The difference between the i5 and the i7 will seem rather marginal relative to the equipment that will be available to us three years from now (actually, to me it already does, given the price spread). Ask yourself: does it really matter today whether you have, say, a 2.4 Ghz or 2.8 Ghz Core 2 Duo? Of course not. The base i5 in the 13" MBP will blow them both out of the water, to say nothing of the quad core parts in the 15" and 17" machines. Continuous improvements in processor architecture ensure that this cycle is likely to repeat many times henceforth.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.