Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,490
37,775


Samsung came out with its 2024 flagship smartphone lineup in January, with the new devices competing directly with the iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Plus, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max. Samsung's high-end S24 Ultra adopts some Apple-like features like a titanium chassis and a 5X zoom lens, but it also has standout additions that set it apart. We have an S24 Ultra, and thought we'd see how one main feature compares to the iPhone 15 Pro Max -- the camera.


The Galaxy S24 Ultra has a 200-megapixel wide-angle camera (Apple's Wide lens is 50 megapixels), a 12-megapixel ultra wide camera (equal to Apple's), a 10-megapixel 3x telephoto lens, and a 50-megapixel 5x telephoto lens (Apple has a single 12-megapixel Telephoto lens). A higher pixel count equates to a higher resolution for printing and cropping in, but it doesn't necessarily make for better images because the size of the sensor is more important.

samsung-galaxy-24-1x-Keybank.jpg

In the sample images, you'll see that there's not too much of a difference between the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the S24 Ultra. The S24 Ultra is a little bit more saturated and the highlights are brightened, so the S24 images can look brighter in straight from the camera comparisons. The iPhone images tend to be sharper for the most part, but Samsung's algorithm works well for night mode images.

samsung-galaxy-24-25x-keybank-s24.jpg

Samsung primarily focused on AI this year, so the S24 Ultra camera is almost identical to the S23 Ultra camera, but the telephoto lens is a major difference. Samsung ditched its 10x telephoto lens and opted instead for a 5x telephoto lens that more closely matches the 5x telephoto lens on the iPhone. Telephoto images are close to the same, but in Portrait mode, Samsung's photos come out crisper.

samsung-galaxy-s24-street.jpg

There are two telephoto lenses in Samsung's smartphone, so it supports up to 10x optical zoom, and Samsung has long had the edge when it comes to digital zoom. The S24 Ultra can zoom in up to 100x, and while the iPhone's digital zoom is good, it's not able to zoom in to that level.

samsung-galaxy-24-portrait-1x.jpg

On the topic of AI, Samsung added some AI-supported features for post processing. You can use generative fill to remove objects from images and change the crop, cut down on noise with remastering, add slow motion to any video, and record with both the front and rear-facing cameras at the same time. We may see camera-related AI additions on the iPhone 16 models or in iOS 18, but for now, Samsung has the edge when it comes to fun AI-based tools.

samsung-galaxy-24-rock-hall-low-light.jpg

No smartphone is able to measure up to the iPhone when it comes to video quality because of its stabilization and resolution, but the Galaxy S24 Ultra is the closest competitor, and it has an edge when it comes to microphone quality. The S24 Ultra's microphone has great noise isolation and clarity, and the Cinematic mode looks nice, though Samsung's Cinematic mode overdoes it on the blur. 4K video is supported at 30 and 60fps, but not 24fps, which is problematic for those who want to shoot high-quality 24fps video. On iPhone, there is a setting for recording 4K video at 24fps.

samsung-galaxy-24-sign-5x-portrait-low-light.jpg

As smartphone cameras get better and better, it gets more difficult to distinguish which smartphone takes superior images. Both the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Galaxy Ultra S24 take excellent quality pictures, and it's impossible to pick an overall winner. We think these cameras are about on par.

samsung-galaxy-24-uw-keybank.jpg

Samsung and Apple are using different algorithms and processing for image capture and to make pictures look sharper in lower light, so you'll see some differences in brightness, white balance, saturation, and similar parameters, and "better" becomes a matter of preference.

Which images do you prefer? Let us know in the comments below.

Article Link: Camera Comparison: Samsung S24 Ultra vs iPhone 15 Pro Max
 
When can we stop referring to these devices as phones and start calling them, more accurately, cameras capable of making and receiving calls. iCamera15 Pro is a far more logical name. Camera features seem to be the lion's share of upgrades from year to year besides the processor.

How long till the back of the iCamera has 10 lenses?
 
Last edited:
When can we stop referring to these devices as phones and start calling them, more accurately, cameras capable of making and receiving calls. iCamera15 Pro is a far more logical name. Camera features seem to be the lion's share of upgrades from year to year besides the processor.
It’s a consequence of our society and culture becoming more and more visual. For better or for worse…
 
  • Like
Reactions: icanhazmac
The photos of the woman are a stark contrast. They almost don’t look like the same woman but I’ll chalk that up the hair part making the face look longer in the iPhone pic. The left/iPhone has better color and the right/Samsung looks washed out.
I’m sure either phone will take excellent photos for the vast majority of people, so it’ll come down operating system presences most likely.
 
When can we stop referring to these devices as phones and start calling them, more accurately, cameras capable of making and receiving calls. iCamera15 Pro is a far more logical name. Camera features seem to be the lion's share of upgrades from year to year besides the processor.
What would you like to see? It is not like the camera was the only component updated each year.
 
Sometimes I like Samsung, sometimes I like iPhone. You really can’t go wrong with the cameras in either one, especially compared to just a few years ago. Most smart phone users today are carrying around better cameras in their pockets than the point-and-click film cameras everyone used to own.
 
What would you like to see? It is not like the camera was the only component updated each year.

Some easy things... better screens, better batteries, faster internals, etc. Which we obviously get but they don't seem to be as celebrated as the latest megapixel counts or zooms.

Harder things... can't say, but things like the addition of the NFC chip and its functionality. Things that add convenience and function to the device versus self serving selfies or the desire to film someone who just fell instead of helping them up.

My point is, as previously stated, the camera and its functionality, seem to be the lion's share of newsworthy announcements when launching these products or comparing them. I may very well be the minority here but I couldn't care less about the camera past taking reasonable quality pictures/video.
 
Last edited:
Wow the iPhone 15 Pro Max totally blows the Galaxy S24 Ultra out of the water in every shot.

Great work.

You think so? I think they both look pretty similar, as far as quality goes. I like the Samsung photo better with the building/key, and the photo with the woman looks more natural with the Samsung.

Not interested in either of these, but I don't think there is really much difference.
 
Camera features seem to be the lion's share of upgrades from year to year besides the processor.
Mostly because as technology improves, there's always been scope to improve the readout / processing / sensor features of the crappy tiny sensor that they basically have to use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ric22
I feel like I'm comparing Coke and Pepsi at this point. o_O
...and it will always be thus, until they start imagining different ways to either stick a much bigger sensor in there without compromises, or aggregate the output of multiple physically separated sensors (something Nokia/Foxconn tried for example) again without compromises.

Then, and only then, can I actually dump the camera I always carry when outside, even though I care enough about my carry weight to actually weigh everything I EDC on at least a yearly basis...
 
Mixed bag. Some Samsung pics look better and some iPhone pics look better. In both cases the differences are user preference and can be adjusted later to suit the user’s preference.
 
I wouldn't say there's a clean winner, sometimes one looks better, other times the other.

I would say i tend to prefer the iPhone in "buildings" pictures and the Samsung on the portrait. The Samsung colours do look more natural.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.