I didn’t even know that there were cases with Camera Control passthrough. That sounds cool.Interesting indeed. Though, it might make all of the case manufactures go back to the dreaded "cutout" instead of the passthrough Camera Control sensor.
Yup, all of the official Apple cases have it, as well as a growing number of third party cases:I didn’t even know that there were cases with Camera Control passthrough. That sounds cool.
How would it be worse? You'd still have Face ID if that's what you want to use. Many Android phones allow both biometrics. Imagine if you could make things require Face ID and Touch ID simultaneously for an extra layer of security.I can’t see apple going back to a less secure authentication method. I can just picture the headlines about Apple deliberately making iPhone security worse.
If people choose Touch ID over Face ID then their security is worse. So you don’t give them the option of Touch ID and instead just give them the more secure Face ID.How would it be worse? You'd still have Face ID if that's what you want to use. Many Android phones allow both biometrics. Imagine if you could make things require Face ID and Touch ID simultaneously for an extra layer of security.
Or in the power button.I think a very small to zero chance of this. Apple is stubborn and considering they name it “Camera Control” it won’t have dual functionality. Not to mention the horrendous placement of it which integrating Touch ID which would make unlocking a hassle. I personally think if Touch ID does return it’ll be in the form of under-display.