Hi
Currently I'm on 512gb storage , can i add up more storage keeping the default storage ?
Hi
Currently I'm on 512gb storage , can i add up more storage keeping the default storage ?
[doublepost=1460804112][/doublepost]There is a 3rd party upgrade from OWC.Yes you can keep the "default storage" (internal SSD) and add more storage rather easily. There are a few options. None being as fast as the internal storage, but you can upwards of 256GB of additional storage bringing your total storage to 768GB with no hardware modifications.
There is the Nifty Mini Drive or Baseqi. You can add up to 200GB MicroSDXC UHS-I U3 card. The benefit here is that the device is machined aluminum and more or less looks built into your macbook.
http://www.minidrive.bynifty.com
http://www.baseqi.com
The Jetdrive Lite 360 with up to 256GB additional storage. It sticks out about a mm and is black, so it is not as streamlined as the above options but it does offer the most additional storage.
http://www.transcend-info.com/apple/jetdrivelite/
There are more options like Tardisk (very expensive) and cheaper plastic adapters but I'm partial to the above three solutions. Personally using the BaseQi and couldn't be happier.
[doublepost=1460804112][/doublepost]There is a 3rd party upgrade from OWC.
here's the link: http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/ssd/owc/macbook-pro-retina-display/2013
have a great day.
MW
The OWC SSDs can also come with an external enclosure for the original Apple SSD, so you can keep using it.
- I agree. It makes far too many compromises.The Aura drive on the other hand is not an upgrade or even a parallel move, it's a step backwards in my opinion especially for those who own the 2015 Macbook Pro.
I do think OWC makes quality products, most often first. I just don't think this particular drive is one of those quality products.
- I haven't seen that. Do you have a link?They are available to purchase as a standalone enclosure for those upgrading their PCIE SSDs
- I agree. It makes far too many compromises.
[doublepost=1460807877][/doublepost]
- I haven't seen that. Do you have a link?
- Thanks. That didn't turn up in my search. Pretty steep, though.
- Thanks. That didn't turn up in my search. Pretty steep, though.
Yes you can keep the "default storage" (internal SSD) and add more storage rather easily. There are a few options. None being as fast as the internal storage, but you can upwards of 256GB of additional storage bringing your total storage to 768GB with no hardware modifications.
There is the Nifty Mini Drive or Baseqi. You can add up to 200GB MicroSDXC UHS-I U3 card. The benefit here is that the device is machined aluminum and more or less looks built into your macbook.
http://www.minidrive.bynifty.com
http://www.baseqi.com
The Jetdrive Lite 360 with up to 256GB additional storage. It sticks out about a mm and is black, so it is not as streamlined as the above options but it does offer the most additional storage.
http://www.transcend-info.com/apple/jetdrivelite/
There are more options like Tardisk (very expensive) and cheaper plastic adapters but I'm partial to the above three solutions. Personally using the BaseQi and couldn't be happier.
Consider also that the mini-drive and the baseqi are both micro-sd adapters which are slower, whereas the jet drive lite is an sd card, therefore gives faster read/write speeds than the other two (equivalent to spinning HD speeds).
I have a minidrive too but mine is an integrated model, it is a SD card.
How can the adapters be slower if they just conect the microSD card to the SD slot?
Tell me is I'm wrong, but the speed depends on memory, adapters have no memory.
My minidrive
http://www.theminidrive.com/product...versal-nano-128gb-only-15mm?variant=964409596
Nice write up on the OWC SSD replacement and this here further explains the RAID situationIt is seen as an external drive because of the RAID configuration
In order to keep costs under control, OWC has opted to not use a native PCIe SSD controller. Instead, the PCIe Aura SSD uses a Marvell 9230 SATA RAID controller and a pair of Silicon Motion SM2256 SATA SSD controllers. The Marvell 9230 has a PCIe 2.0 x2 host interface, so the PCIe Aura SSD has the potential to outperform SATA SSDs but won't be able to approach the peak transfer rates of the recent Samsung SM951-based Apple originals. The Silicon Motion SM2256 controllers mean the PCIe Aura SSD is almost certainly using TLC flash, which is less expensive but also performs worse and draws more power than MLC flash. The PCIe Aura SSD's RAID design unfortunately does not support passing through TRIM commands nor retrieving SMART information from the individual SSD controllers.
The Jet Drive Lite is slower than many Micro SDXC cards, especially when it comes to writing incompressible data like photos, music, videos and I'm assuming that's what most will put on there. Where as you can throw a Samsung Pro+ or SanDisk Extreme Pro in the BaseQi or Nifty and reach 90+ MB/s read and write speeds with any kind of data.
read speeds of up to 95MB/s and write speeds of up to 60MB/s.
But as I said, the JetDrive Lite does match or exceed most microSDXC cards, other than the very latest Sandisk Extreme Pro which is as yet unavailable. So yes, you could shove a faster SD card in the slot, but then it pokes out the side of the case by ~8mm.To again address what Modernape said. True, there are SD cards with better performance than the best MicroSDXC cards but the Jet Drive Lite does not come close to the performance of those SD cards in fact only reaching ~ half their write speeds.
From the Transcend site:
But as I said, the JetDrive Lite does match or exceed most microSDXC cards, other than the very latest Sandisk Extreme Pro which is as yet unavailable. So yes, you could shove a faster SD card in the slot, but then it pokes out the side of the case by ~8mm.
I ran a Mac benchmark app called Blackmagic Disk Speed Test, and it showed averages of around 65 MB/s for reading and 10 MB/s for writing.
It’s write speeds proved inconsistent, fluctuating from a low of 20MB/s to a high of 55MB/s.
I just purchased the baseqi today. Looks like a great product. Why does it seem to only support up to 200GB? Is that the max storage size you can use in it?
Thank you for this. At least I know I can add more storage down the line if needed. I'm going to be using it strictly to house my iTunes library and iPhone / iPad backups.