Another facet to an already complex issue. I kinda have to admire the frankness of the woman and the real example she embodies as an imperfect individual making imperfect choices.
While I am sure some may choose to judge this woman, or users in general, I tend to look at this as an example of the fallacy of criminalizing pleasureable and addictive behavior. While there is no doubt that there are considerable social, human and financial costs in drug usage, it is abundantly clear that people will always make poor or foolish choices often based on their selfish interests.
Seems to me like this is another example of why most, if not all drugs, should be legalized, regulated and taxed, to at least eliminate some of the current abhorrent behavior in the black-market supply chain. Offer rehabilitation and treatment options to those who need or ask for it to be paid by the user or by the state, depending on circumstance. Is it a perfect solution? Of course not, but we hardly live in a perfect world. It seems the most preferable of available options.
To those that might think such a course of action would encourage further drug-use by the populace, it seems perfectly obvious that as this woman shows, it hardly matters to those who want to use it, regardless of penalties. As far as the decision to go after middle-class users, well at least it is a more fair approach, but it is likely to further expose the logical outcome of a criminalization policy on all users - failure. The costs are astronomical, and the benefits are short-lived and marginal at best.
I am sure some will disagree. It is only my opinion.