You can’t go wrong with the SBSS and milanese loop. I have that combination and love it. Just be aware the milanese loop can scratch the DLC coating on the SBSS so try not to let it come in contact with the watch and all will be fine. Enjoy your new watch.Just circling back to this, I decided to go with the SBSS model with the milanese loop and couple of other sports bands for when i'm working out.
I liked the titanium a lot, but at the end decided that I prefer the stainless steel a bit more as it felt more premium to me (likely due to the heft).
Given that it's my first AW, I'm so excited about it. I hope it lasts me 3 years.
If one can afford to upgrade to SS or Ti every year than why not? It’s their money. Besides, one doesn’t need to upgrade every year if the current watch meets their needs.these watches need to be replaced with new one every year if you are a tech geek like me.
titanium is over priced and SS is too heavy. Aluminum is the way to go.
these watches need to be replaced with new one every year if you are a tech geek like me.
titanium is over priced and SS is too heavy. Aluminum is the way to go.
Actually titanium is not as hard as SS and scratches more easily. It's 4 times as strong as SS and is significantly lighter and has better heat resistance, which is why it's used in aerospace.Titanium is generally the hardest metal. It’s why it’s used for space shuttles. Unlike my SS, my titanium has taken so much abuse and doesn’t have a single scratch. My SS scratches very easily.
You made the right choice.Just circling back to this, I decided to go with the SBSS model with the milanese loop and couple of other sports bands for when i'm working out.
I liked the titanium a lot, but at the end decided that I prefer the stainless steel a bit more as it felt more premium to me (likely due to the heft).
Given that it's my first AW, I'm so excited about it. I hope it lasts me 3 years.
Depends on if you are used to wearing traditional watches. For me the aluminum feels like a toy. I love the heft of the SS. Just used to it after years of wearing regular watches.these watches need to be replaced with new one every year if you are a tech geek like me.
titanium is over priced and SS is too heavy. Aluminum is the way to go.
Ohhh yes it is very noticeableThe weight difference between aluminum and stainless steel is just 10 grams. I don’t think this is really noticeable.
it is noticeable to me too.Depends on if you are used to wearing traditional watches. For me the aluminum feels like a toy. I love the heft of the SS. Just used to it after years of wearing regular watches.
[automerge]1577038728[/automerge]
Ohhh yes it is very noticeable
And to me. I originally ordered the gold SS S5 but having not worn a watch in 20 years it felt like a lead weight on my wrist - especially with the Milanese loop. If resale prices were reasonable I’d have gone for the Titanium, but with the prices as they are, just settled for SG aluminium.it is noticeable to me too.
And to me. I originally ordered the gold SS S5 but having not worn a watch in 20 years it felt like a lead weight on my wrist - especially with the Milanese loop. If resale prices were reasonable I’d have gone for the Titanium, but with the prices as they are, just settled for SG aluminium.
Well it’s a concern because the resale on any Apple Watch is pretty much garbage. Which is strange. Or it proves how overpriced it is. I love mine but it does seem to be bI'm genuinely curious who is purchasing their AW with the sole purpose of resale value?
Not here to judge, but if you have the means that few hundred dollar difference b/w aluminum and SS is absolutely worth it. Let me repeat: if you can afford it, why wouldn't one get a SS or a titanium model vs. the aluminum.
On the flip side, if your finances are not that secure, why even get the AW in the first place?
Lastly, it's always going to be a personal choice between aluminum, SS, Ti, and Ceramic. I totally understand it, but I still can't wrap my head around why the resale value is the primary concern.
Genuinely curious.
Well it’s a concern because the resale on any Apple Watch is pretty much garbage. Which is strange. Or it proves how overpriced it is. I love mine but it does seem to be b
very high in price compared to an iPhone. Most 2-3 year old Apple watches can’t be sold for more than 1-200.....even the stainless models. You’ll be lucky to get $300 for a S4 stainless and it cost $700+ brand new. That’s terrible compared to a one year old iPhone or iPad.
This leads me to wonder why the resale is so bad? Is it because the technology is improving at such a fast pace?
Which leads me to ask: will the resale value improve for next-generation if the tech is levelled off?
Good point. I’m guessing that resale is going to increase due to Apple wanting People to upgrade. Indeed the watch got really good really fast. So to avoid a steep drop off in adoption soon Apple will have to have incentives. Like they did last year for iPhone. Also, the series 4 is still be sold by a lot of online retailers at a measly $50 discount on most models.This leads me to wonder why the resale is so bad? Is it because the technology is improving at such a fast pace?
Which leads me to ask: will the resale value improve for next-generation if the tech is levelled off?
I don’t understand all the complaints about resale value.
It’s not that complicated, the Apple Watch is not a cheap product, as a matter fact, it’s one of the most expensive smart watches on the market, let alone for the stainless/titanium edition. And then when consumers are ready to upgrade to the next Gen and they find out that the resale/trade- in value is abysmal, I can see why that would be upsetting to some.
Especially for those who own the stainless and titanium watch models, those take the worst hit in terms of ‘resale’ value, which can shock some, because it’s also the most expensive models.
It’s not that complicated, the Apple Watch is not a cheap product, as a matter fact, it’s one of the most expensive smart watches on the market, let alone for the stainless/titanium edition. And then when consumers are ready to upgrade to the next Gen and they find out that the resale/trade- in value is abysmal, I can see why that would be upsetting to some.
How did you get 125 for a S0? According to Apple they’ll only give me $70 for my S3 Stainless Steel.But that is the case with most consumer electronics. My LG OLED TV is a year old and it's worth a fair bit less than I paid for it on the resale market. Same with my UHD Blu-ray player.
Honestly, of all my tech, Apple holds its value the bestt, but still loses a fair amount over a handful of years - especially if the latest version is substantially better (which it often is, considering the rapid pace of development). I did get $125 for my Series 0 stainless steel watch, which pleasantly surprised me.
How did you get 125 for a S0? According to Apple they’ll only give me $70 for my S3 Stainless Steel.
How can you dispose the worthless disposable item to a deserving friend or family member?I don’t understand all the complaints about resale value. Trying to compare it to the iphone is a waste of time. They are different products, with different demand levels and different margins and revenue streams.
Just treat the AW as a disposable item when you are ready to dispose of it, for whatever reason. Regard the resale value, whatever it might be as a bonus. Life would be more serene, if not regarding resale value as a right. Treat it as if there’s no resale and make upgrade decisions based on features w/o reference to resale.
Alternatively, gift it to a deserving friend or family member, who has been there for you.