The two that look good to me are:
Late 2008 15.4 inch 2.4 G C2D Macbook pro with its discrete graphics card, larger screen and express/34 slot (but only 2 Gig RAM)
Summer 2009 13.3 inch 2.53 C2D Macbook pro with its integrated graphics reportedly better (but smaller screen), SD slot and 4 Gig RAM.
It has been difficult to find information on the performance difference between using the 9600M discrete graphics vs the integrated 9400M graphics. I saw people saying it made no difference and people saying that it was good to turn on the discrete card for games. There seemed to be a flurry of commentary on this when they dropped the discrete card but I don't see much talk about it now. Maybe it was assumed to be an issue and it is not?
Both machines are going for $1299. I am sure that I will end up being happy with either, nevertheless, if anyone has any advice it would be appreciated. I will be living with this decision for a couple years
Late 2008 15.4 inch 2.4 G C2D Macbook pro with its discrete graphics card, larger screen and express/34 slot (but only 2 Gig RAM)
Summer 2009 13.3 inch 2.53 C2D Macbook pro with its integrated graphics reportedly better (but smaller screen), SD slot and 4 Gig RAM.
It has been difficult to find information on the performance difference between using the 9600M discrete graphics vs the integrated 9400M graphics. I saw people saying it made no difference and people saying that it was good to turn on the discrete card for games. There seemed to be a flurry of commentary on this when they dropped the discrete card but I don't see much talk about it now. Maybe it was assumed to be an issue and it is not?
Both machines are going for $1299. I am sure that I will end up being happy with either, nevertheless, if anyone has any advice it would be appreciated. I will be living with this decision for a couple years