I think the remarks are that Cinebench is heavily optimized for Intel x86-64 and not so much for Apple silicon. I'm not sure why you think those remarks are controversial?Cue the remarks about Cinebench being a horrible product, 3,2,1![]()
I did not say they were controversialwhy you think those remarks are controversial?
Yes my sources found a leaked benchmark of M2 Max, and with the help of this leaked benchmark of M2 Max my sources are able find more about M2 Max and M2 Pro. With the help of my sources I am getting to know even more about M2 Pro and Max.you found a leaked ...and in the second post you said is testing according to your sources...nice try
So the "final" benchmark will be the real one while this is fake
M2 Max has scored 2027 single core in geekbench which so much better than M2.Again, M2 max providing less performance than M2 in cpu..your source should not be trusted
Even you after, said that the final benchmark, the real one will be better
Again, M2 max providing less performance than M2 in cpu..your source should not be trusted
Even you after, said that the final benchmark, the real one will be better
The M2 Chip gets 1585 in Single Core in Cinebench R23.The normal M2 gets 1701 in Single Score 🤷🏼♂️
now are you comparing geekbench with cinebnech r23? make up your mind. Please dont register just to post these kind of stuff here, we have enough alreadyM2 Max has scored 2027 single core in geekbench which so much better than M2.
so why you said in the original post that you find it?I have got this information from my sources.
Just took the score from here.The M2 Chip gets 1585 in Single Core in Cinebench R23.
Not much better. My M2 gets 1945 single-core or so on GB5. You can't compare the average GB scores with a single benchmark. The averages are always much lower than what you can achieve if you make a small effort making sure nothing else is running and starting a fresh reboot (wait until all startup tasks complete.)M2 Max has scored 2027 single core in geekbench which so much better than M2.
Sorry this comparison.now are you comparing geekbench with cinebnech r23? make up your mind. Please dont register just to post these kind of stuff here, we have enough already
Here we are not talking about geekbench
I got this info from my sources.so why you said in the original post that you find it?
I think this thread can be closed until further extra informations
This guy is saying that M2 score 1701.The normal M2 gets 1701 in Single Score 🤷🏼♂️
It wrote by mistake.so why you said in the original post that you find it?
I think this thread can be closed until further extra informations
People aren't saying it's horrible, they're saying it's not properly optimized for Apple Silicon, and thus should not be used as a cross-platform comparator. If we compare it to more platform-neutral benchmarks like SPEC or Geekbench, it appears that Cinebench suffers about a 10% AS-specific penalty.Cue the remarks about Cinebench being a horrible product, 3,2,1![]()
Yes, it is not properly optimzed for Apple silicon. But it still is a great platform for pushing devices to their max power.People aren't saying it's horrible, they're saying it's not properly optimized for Apple Silicon, and thus should not be used as a cross-platform comparator. If we compare it to more platform-neutral benchmarks like SPEC or Geekbench, it appears that Cinebench suffers about a 10% AS-specific penalty.