Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

streetsandtheatres

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 26, 2016
55
28
I'm looking for a 4tb external, portable SSD. I'll be using it on a 16" Macbook Pro (M1 Pro), for Final Cut Pro libraries (nothing 8K or anything serious like that) and a Lightroom archive.
Is SanDisk 4TB Extreme Portable SSD a good choice? Is there any advantage to upgrading to the Pro version?
Any other suggestions that are readily available? I guess the 2TB Samsung T7 might be worth considering, even if smaller in size?
 
Last edited:
Are you going to be doing a lot of write activity? Do you need sustained write performance? If this is mainly just right once and store with infrequent new writes. Your choice doesn't matter much. They'll all be fine.

In general this is the hierarchy
(Samsung X5 > Sandisk Extreme Pro > Samsung T7 > Sandisk Extreme)

In this review you can see how the above models compare to each other. There'll be some variances based on capacity. Larger capacity of the same model are generally a little faster than their lower capacity counterparts. Although 4TB models are sometimes a little slower than 2TB.

I'd also consider just buying a USB 3.1 Gen 2 NVMe enclosure. Then picking your own SSD. My preference being the 970 Evo.

Warning: Any review you find may not be current. SSD manufacturers often change to slower parts after the reviews come out. This has been made worse from the supply constraints of the pandemic.

Even Samsung had to do this in some models. Even though they make the parts. This is the first time they've done this. At least they used alternative good parts of their revised models. Still it affected performance metrics. But they actually announced it and I believe adjusted the SKUs to reflect the change.

Still Samsung is the brand I trust most. Not to monkey around with their models in secret. To cut costs after reviews. Then say it still technically meets the advertised specs.
 
Are you going to be doing a lot of write activity? Do you need sustained write performance? If this is mainly just right once and store with infrequent new writes. Your choice doesn't matter much. They'll all be fine.

In general this is the hierarchy
(Samsung X5 > Sandisk Extreme Pro > Samsung T7 > Sandisk Extreme)

In this review you can see how the above models compare to each other. There'll be some variances based on capacity. Larger capacity of the same model are generally a little faster than their lower capacity counterparts. Although 4TB models are sometimes a little slower than 2TB.

I'd also consider just buying a USB 3.1 Gen 2 NVMe enclosure. Then picking your own SSD. My preference being the 970 Evo.

Warning: Any review you find may not be current. SSD manufacturers often change to slower parts after the reviews come out. This has been made worse from the supply constraints of the pandemic.

Even Samsung had to do this in some models. Even though they make the parts. This is the first time they've done this. At least they used alternative good parts of their revised models. Still it affected performance metrics. But they actually announced it and I believe adjusted the SKUs to reflect the change.

Still Samsung is the brand I trust most. Not to monkey around with their models in secret. To cut costs after reviews. Then say it still technically meets the advertised specs.
OK thank you very much. Read speed is probably more important than writing speed. Mostly Final Cut Pro editing and Lightroom storage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.