Hey!
I am in the process of completing my workstation (very simple) and recently bought the LG 24UD58-B 4K from Amazon for around $270. I previously had an old Samsung 24inch monitor that was only capable of standard HD but got fed up with the picture quality after getting used to the M2 Air's screen. I didn't want to spend a lot of money, so this LG monitor seemed like a good deal--and I am happy with it so far.
My question is-- even though my new monitor says I am using it at 1920x1080-- the quality looks far superior to my old 24inch Samsung display, which was also running at 1920x1080. Does that make sense? The resolution options I have are 1504 x 846, 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, 3008 x 1692, and 3840 x 2160. I am trying to find the the perfect balance between display resolution quality, battery consumption, etc. Does anyone run their external on a specific resolution for a specific reason. I am only using the external monitor for basic activities-- web browsing, email, excel, etc. Thanks!
I am in the process of completing my workstation (very simple) and recently bought the LG 24UD58-B 4K from Amazon for around $270. I previously had an old Samsung 24inch monitor that was only capable of standard HD but got fed up with the picture quality after getting used to the M2 Air's screen. I didn't want to spend a lot of money, so this LG monitor seemed like a good deal--and I am happy with it so far.
My question is-- even though my new monitor says I am using it at 1920x1080-- the quality looks far superior to my old 24inch Samsung display, which was also running at 1920x1080. Does that make sense? The resolution options I have are 1504 x 846, 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, 3008 x 1692, and 3840 x 2160. I am trying to find the the perfect balance between display resolution quality, battery consumption, etc. Does anyone run their external on a specific resolution for a specific reason. I am only using the external monitor for basic activities-- web browsing, email, excel, etc. Thanks!