M MBX macrumors 68020 Original poster Sep 14, 2006 2,030 817 Apr 13, 2010 #1 Sorry if i got this wrong but as far as i see the top end CPU is the Core i7, running at 2.66ghz and is a dual core (not 4 cores), right? Isn't that a step backwards compared the previous 3ghz c2d cpu that is also dual-core?
Sorry if i got this wrong but as far as i see the top end CPU is the Core i7, running at 2.66ghz and is a dual core (not 4 cores), right? Isn't that a step backwards compared the previous 3ghz c2d cpu that is also dual-core?
Hellhammer Moderator emeritus Dec 10, 2008 22,165 582 Finland Apr 13, 2010 #2 MBX said: Sorry if i got this wrong but as far as i see the top end CPU is the Core i7, running at 2.66ghz and is a dual core (not 4 cores), right? Isn't that a step backwards compared the previous 3ghz c2d cpu that is also dual-core? Click to expand... It's dual core but due new technologies such as Nehalem architecture, 32nm manufacturing process, Turbo boost and Hyper-Threading, it's up to 30% faster
MBX said: Sorry if i got this wrong but as far as i see the top end CPU is the Core i7, running at 2.66ghz and is a dual core (not 4 cores), right? Isn't that a step backwards compared the previous 3ghz c2d cpu that is also dual-core? Click to expand... It's dual core but due new technologies such as Nehalem architecture, 32nm manufacturing process, Turbo boost and Hyper-Threading, it's up to 30% faster
sammich macrumors 601 Sep 26, 2006 4,306 268 Sarcasmville. Apr 13, 2010 #4 Just read the 'Performance' section in the Macbook Pro info page. Newer CPU tech is always more efficient per clock cycle then the previous.
Just read the 'Performance' section in the Macbook Pro info page. Newer CPU tech is always more efficient per clock cycle then the previous.