L
Lau
Guest
Original poster
This is slightly weird (and potentially one of those threads along the lines of those started by some of our less intelligible members
), but just occurred to me when reading this thread about the relative likelihood of death via incompetent car bomber versus using a flight of stairs.
What if, instead of worrying about the things that we worry about, we had an accurate sense of danger? Currently, people avoid things that aren't really dangerous (i.e. a whole city if there's a suspected bomb, or never fly on planes) but tend to not worry so much about things that really are dangerous, like crossing the road or smoking.
So, what would life be like if our sense of fear was directly linked to the likelihood* of death by doing something? What would we be happy to do and what would be totally different? We'd all be living in single story houses, or have Stannah stairlifts for starters.
*Thanks to dynamicv for the link
What if, instead of worrying about the things that we worry about, we had an accurate sense of danger? Currently, people avoid things that aren't really dangerous (i.e. a whole city if there's a suspected bomb, or never fly on planes) but tend to not worry so much about things that really are dangerous, like crossing the road or smoking.
So, what would life be like if our sense of fear was directly linked to the likelihood* of death by doing something? What would we be happy to do and what would be totally different? We'd all be living in single story houses, or have Stannah stairlifts for starters.
*Thanks to dynamicv for the link