Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dk808

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 13, 2015
616
364
Lets say you have a 512 gb ssd. If you used about 350 gb of it and had about 150 gb left, would it be slower than a mbp pro that has 300 gb left?
 
No. The only time hard drive space effects performance is when you have almost none left. In that case, applications that rely on cached space have none to work with and therefore slow to a crawl. This applies on a MacBook the same as it does on an iPhone, PC, or any kind of computer with storage.
 
No. The only time hard drive space effects performance is when you have almost none left. In that case, applications that rely on cached space have none to work with and therefore slow to a crawl. This applies on a MacBook the same as it does on an iPhone, PC, or any kind of computer with storage.
What would you consider as almost none? Like less than 20gb?
 
What would you consider as almost none? Like less than 20gb?

I'd say that's relative to overall hard drive size. Anything less than 25% of my overall capacity and I start cleaning house. I like to keep mine between 50-60%, personally. Even that is probably overkill, I just like having wiggle room if I wanna go crazy and download a ton of stuff. I also have a 128GB hard drive in my rMBP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.