Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Question on title

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 22.5%
  • No

    Votes: 27 67.5%
  • Idk/Results

    Votes: 4 10.0%

  • Total voters
    40
  • This poll will close: .

SMG4fan7236

macrumors newbie
Original poster
It would reuse the iPhone 14 design but it is double-sided. One side supports Apple Intelligence, features a home button, uses the classic camera, and features Touch ID. The other uses the Dynamic Island camera and gestures, features Face ID, also supports Apple Intelligence, and is more water-resistant. Sides can be changed in your control center, and if you are taking a picture in front of the camera and not the screen you are using, the phone uses the camera on the side you are NOT using, the camera is used for the side you are using if you use a front camera like a reflection or something.
 
Rebrand the "e" as the iPhone Neo to capitalise on the Neo's success, offer it in some cool colours, use the 16's screen and put it at $499.
 
I definitely feel there is room for a slightly different phone for the E series, rather than just a slightly less feature rich version of every other phone they make.
 
Lots of people have unreadable fingerprints so Touch ID is wasted on their devices. I couldn't train Touch ID to work for my mother. Tried several of her fingers. Finally looked under a microscope and saw no patterns on her fingertips! She was so happy when Face ID arrived.
 
I have many more instances of failure/annoyance with Face ID than I had with Touch ID, but this will vary from person to person because of differences in physiology, preferences, and circumstances.

The home button had one main advantage in that it was an easy, consistent way to navigate to "home" and "app switcher", even if the phone and app/UI on screen were in different orientations. With the swipe from bottom edge gesture, the bottom edge will change depending on how you're holding your phone (or which way it's sitting on a stand or mount), which app/UI is open, and whether lock orientation is on. It's less automatic as it can take a moment to figure out which way is "bottom" depending on the app. And then if holding the phone with one hand and the "bottom" edge is the opposite edge from your thumb, with how wide phones are these days, it's more difficult to reach across the screen to swipe from that edge. I find the inconsistent "bottom" edge and sometimes having to reach across the screen to swipe a little annoying, especially when switching a lot between apps that force different orientations. The button also allowed for a bunch more ways to initiate different actions (via single/double/triple/long click/tap).

The benefit of the swipe gesture is obviously that it allows for a bezel-less design (although I personally don't find that as valuable as others), your thumb doesn't have to reach down as far when using the phone with one hand, and it's more consistent with iPad gestures. Note with iPad though, the bottom edge is much more consistent because pretty much all apps/UIs are supported in both portrait and landscape. I do find it annoying that one orientation or the other is forced so much in iPhone apps/UIs.

So what would be ideal for me is if my phone had both the button and the swipe gesture, just like my iPad Mini 5 has. I don't really care about going bezel-less, but I know I'm in the minority there.
 
I wouldn't like to go back to a home button, but only because it takes up so much of the front of the device. I want the smallest device possible (SE1 was perfect) with the largest screen that can fit.

If there was an underscreen virtual home button, then my answer would change to yes. I believe the underscreen touch ID technology is much more secure than the home button was, so another plus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UliBaer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.