You're not getting it. That still wouldn't look right. 20" ACD's are 1680x1050px. It still wouldn't match the 1600px of the 30.heh good point. i didnt check the res out. so any one got pics of their 20 ACD, 30 ACD, 20 ACD setup? please post a pic. thanks
What size/res is that setup. looks like Dell monitors. UGH
I'll say it again. 1 x 30" wide, 2 x 20" standard.What size/res is that setup. looks like Dell monitors. UGH
Currently have a 22 and 19, with the 19 spending most of the time in portrait mode. Both are on ergotron in desk arms and can be pushed, pulled, elevated and rotated. I like it, but want dual 24's.
Doesn't really bother me to have the resolution between them different, haven't really thought of matching them up. But now I am shopping new monitors, so we shall see.
To the OP. Its not horrible having different resolutions when spanning. Espeically if you use each screen as a new work area. I usually have the main 22 open for work / games, then the 19 for web browsing.
23-30-23 would be heaven. If you get there, we need a pic.
the only problem is trying to mount the 23's vertically as the apple stand only allows for a landscape position. which means I have to go VESA mount + extra stand?![]()
Why are you turning down Dell Displays? They are some of the best displays around a consumer/business level (Same as ACD) and have seriously like more than 5 times as much inputs as the apple displays. The only types of monitor that are superior to them are professional grade monitors like high end NEC, and EIZO. Dell computers might be worse than apples, but dell displays are definitely not inferior to apple displays. Dell also has the best monitor replacement policy in the industry.What size/res is that setup. looks like Dell monitors. UGH