The most common items I use are the complications on my watch face. They are quick to load and the items I normally use, but I do use glances for activity rings, battery, weather and my checking balance a lot. Occasional heart rate.Now that third party complications are available with watchOS 2, do any of you still use glances? Do you think they're still useful?
Now that third party complications are available with watchOS 2, do any of you still use glances? Do you think they're still useful?
A complication isn't necessarily a good substitute for a glance and vice versa. Complications, glances and apps each provide different levels of details. There's a good reason why Apple designed them the way they are.
Let's take stock Weather for example:
Take stock Calendar as another example:
The real issue, IMO, is with the "stock" apps. I use BeWeather2 for weather and Fantastical 2 for my calendar app. Both offer customization with the complications so that you can get more much more information than the stock apps offer within their complications.
The use of more robust apps with the customizable complications make the uses of the glances unnecessary, in many cases.
That said, however, there are still some gaps in complications that make glances useful in those situations (sports scores, for example).
Take stock Calendar as another example:
Complication - shows just the time for your next event (unless you have Utility and Mickey Mouse)
Glance - shows the details for your next event as well as prominently displays the date at the top
App - shows the events for the next several days
It's helpful to have Calendar glance smack dap in the middle of glances, so you can quickly swipe down and back up to see what your next event is, rather than the time consuming process of clicking on the complication to go to the app to view the next several days' worth of events then exiting the app.
Additionally, you can skip date as one of the complications as you can simply swipe down to the calendar glance to view the date as necessary.
When I close glances they stay on the same view i left them on (ie if i'm all the way to the left on settings, the next time i open glances it'll be there) - how does having calendar in the middle help as you suggest? am i doing something wrong? do yours always open on the middle - i'd like this as my primary use for glances is now playing and times im using it are times i don't want to fuss about finding the glance.
Good question. I use the glances to the left and right of the Calandar glance far less frequently so I often find myself on the Calandar glance. At least that's the best we can do unless Apple makes it possible to always return to a default glance, much like how we have the ability to set to always return to the last used app or watch face upon waking the screen.
I use Glances Daily, Complications and glances are the way I access Apps. I don't often use the app screen to access apps.
I do think if Apple offer 2 levels of glances it would be handy to have often used apps on the first level (what we have now) and less used apps on a second level. If you have many Glances it can sometimes be annoying scrolling from the first one to your last one. What I mean by 2 levels goes something like this...........Go to glances as you normally would, and for the 2nd level you swipe your finger up one more time to access less used glances, just a thought![]()
Amen, would love to see this too.The problem is current AW design is already too complicate for lots of people who are attract to Apple' simplicity. Just search in utube.
What I like to see is capable of having 2-3 watch face with complications all active at same times. And simply swipe left/right to get to these 2-3 watch face without have to press, and with all complication stay actives in background I these 2-3 faces.
This could be selected, up to 3 active faces,
by swipe down in watch face selection menu. Like multi screen in iPhone.
The problem is current AW design is already too complicate for lots of people who are attract to Apple' simplicity. Just search in utube.
What I like to see is capable of having 2-3 watch face with complications all active at same times. And simply swipe left/right to get to these 2-3 watch face without have to press, and with all complication stay actives in background I these 2-3 faces.
This could be selected, up to 3 active faces,
by swipe down in watch face selection menu. Like multi screen in iPhone.
The problem is current AW design is already too complicate for lots of people who are attract to Apple' simplicity. Just search in utube.
What I like to see is capable of having 2-3 watch face with complications all active at same times. And simply swipe left/right to get to these 2-3 watch face without have to press, and with all complication stay actives in background in these 2-3 faces.
This could be selected, up to 3 active faces,
by swipe down in watch face selection menu. Like multi screen in iPhone.
I find that the 3rd party glances don't update as quick as I'd like them and that they always take time to refresh.