The only thing I want to do with a new Mac mini that might conceivably go faster with Radeon graphics and on which I am willing to spend money is "frantic web research": namely, opening lots of tabs, switching quickly between tabs and scrolling in Google Chrome. Those things would not go significantly quicker with Radeon graphics, would they?
I am pretty sure that when my computer has been unable to keep up with my "frantic web research", most of the time, the delay is because the page's Javascript has not finished running. Surely, Radeon graphics is not going to help with that; is it?
I almost did not post this because the answer seems so clear, but then again, well, I am no expert.
Another source of delay in the past has been waiting for large images to show up on the rendered page. If the image is not already in graphical memory, would Radeon graphics do that significantly faster than Intel graphics? (If so, is that because the bandwidth between CPU and Radeon graphics is higher than that between CPU and Intel graphics?)
Finally, same question for PDFs instead of images.
Thanks in advance.
I am pretty sure that when my computer has been unable to keep up with my "frantic web research", most of the time, the delay is because the page's Javascript has not finished running. Surely, Radeon graphics is not going to help with that; is it?
I almost did not post this because the answer seems so clear, but then again, well, I am no expert.
Another source of delay in the past has been waiting for large images to show up on the rendered page. If the image is not already in graphical memory, would Radeon graphics do that significantly faster than Intel graphics? (If so, is that because the bandwidth between CPU and Radeon graphics is higher than that between CPU and Intel graphics?)
Finally, same question for PDFs instead of images.
Thanks in advance.