performance improving genes are approaching clinical trials (for legitimate reasons). it's just a matter of time before athletes start using them. They'll pay the price down the line, but do they care? Are sports as we know themdoomed?
a quite interesting article from the new scientist:
a quite interesting article from the new scientist:
when we get to that point (if we are not there yet) I think we should just give up and let the athletes take whatever they please.new scientist said:Gene cheats
Drug scandals in sport would be nothing compared to the potential for genetic engineering to create "super-athletes"
...
This may sound like the ultimate sporting nightmare, but the technology to make it come true could well arrive even before 2008. Scientists around the world are working to perfect gene therapies to treat genetic diseases. Soon, unscrupulous athletes may be able to use them to re-engineer their bodies for better performance.
Need more endurance? Add a gene to bolster delivery of oxygen to labouring tissues. Want bigger muscles? Inject them with a gene that will make them grow. Both techniques are under development, and if they work in humans as they do in lab animals, they will change the face of nearly every sport. But at what cost? Knowing how to boost performance is one thing; knowing how to do it safely is quite another. If athletes do turn to gene therapy, these genetically enhanced champions risk paying for their success with heart disease, strokes and early death.
...
So does this mean that the authorities will finally lose their long battle against drugs in sport? Don Catlin, a biochemist who studies gene therapy abuse at the Olympic drug testing lab at the University of California in Los Angeles, has little doubt that athletes and their doctors will resort to gene doping. "I don't like what they do - it's dirty - but I have to admit I'm impressed with the sophistication of doctors on the 'other side'," he says.
...
If history is any guide, scientists will have a tough time staying ahead of the cheats. That, at least, is nothing new. "There's a lot of money at stake, and drug tests are easy to circumvent," say Yesalis, who thinks many of the records set in the past 30 years have been drug aided. "Users have kicked butt on the drug testers for 40 years. What makes anyone think that's going to change?