Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,065
38,788


Update 9:45 a.m.: In a reply on Twitter, Dropbox founder and CEO Drew Houston apologized for the confusion sparked by the "not ideal" support responses and said that Dropbox is "certainly supporting Apple silicon" with a native Apple silicon build planned for release in the first half of next year. Original article below.





Dropbox appears to have no plans to natively support Apple silicon Macs, almost a year after the first Macs with the M1 chip became available.

General-Dropbox-Feature.jpg

An official Dropbox support thread, shared by Mitchell Hashimoto on Twitter, reveals a fiasco around native support for Apple silicon Macs. Dropbox is seemingly insisting that a significant number of community members will have to vote for native Apple silicon support for it to be implemented. There are also multiple repetitious requests with different phrasing, fragmenting users' votes for support.



In July, responses from Dropbox staff on the thread explained that "this idea is going to need a bit more support before we share your suggestion with our team," and flagged Apple silicon support as in need of more votes. A month ago, Dropbox staff again replied to the thread requesting native Apple silicon support, saying that Dropbox will continue to be compatible with all devices that run supported versions of macOS using Apple's Rosetta translation layer.

Additional complaints in the thread claim that Dropbox with Rosetta hemorrhages MacBook battery life and uses a disproportionate amount of memory.

While Dropbox could still natively support Apple silicon Macs in the future, the way in which the issue has been delegated to two standoffish responses on a support thread appears to have caused outrage, with the thread brimming with irate replies and claims that users are planning to move to rival services.

Google Drive was recently updated with native support for Apple silicon, and other services such as Microsoft OneDrive and Box are already testing native Apple silicon support.



Article Link: Dropbox Planning to Add Native Apple Silicon Support to Mac App in First Half of 2022 [Updated]
 
Last edited:
I could've been all smug about NextCloud, but then I realised that still only works on Rosetta 2 as well. Ah well. Delivery fail today on my new Macbook Pro so they have 24 hours to fix it or i walk!

or... i was kinda looking for a macos app project to learn swift-ui on. properly native nextcloud client maybe ? probably not too ambitious and... tests the proposition that just writing fully native client apps for each platform works out better and cheaper in long run than trying to use multiplatform frameworks. (nextcloud is QT-based. and fugly on a mac as all QT-based apps are.)

People have been pointing out Maestral, as an alternative dropbox client. that's surely a bit precarious though if the communication protocols are all proprietary. at least i think nextcloud's protocols are open. i think...
 
Their loss. They've made some strange decisions over the past several years, and the value of their services has dropped accordingly. There is such a good range of services at the moment that it's hard to keep falling back on the block-sync and reliability as strong features.

Box is just an all round better service, if you're after the best bang for buck.
 
Last edited:
I don’t have much on Dropbox anyway, but I have a Windows PC so apple silicon support isn’t going to be a top concern.

With that being said, Apple silicon support has been spotty for many major applications. Acronis doesn’t offer preliminary support for Monterey atm, meaning Monterey backup is not possible. VSCode is not native enough either, as macOS keeps saying the app will not work on a future release of macOS.

People could just move away from Dropbox no problem, but software support has been lagging here and there. By 2022, if apple cuts off Rosetta from macOS 13, I dunno what macOS could’ve been after then. A platform without big enough software library will find it hard to become mainstream. Maybe apple still believe they have unlimited market power and hold all the cards. Who knows.
 
I dropped my paid Dropbox when they increased costs dramatically a while back.

I only retain a "free" account because of some widespread file sharing I do. But I have been intending to move away completely.

Used to be so appealing, but they have taken turn after turn to make people run away.
 
If you use Dropbox on your Mac (Intel or M1) do yourself a favour and check out Maestral. It's a lightweight 3rd party Dropbox client that doesn't chew up all your resources and also strips away all the extra crap that Dropbox has shovelled into their app over the years.
 
I don't believe that they will not do a native version. Some supervisor, will probably overturn this when he reads this story, because otherwise they would be signalling their slow death.
 
Last edited:
That is really bad. Any app claiming they have no plans to update their code to natively support Apple Silicons is basically saying they don't want to invest in Macs anymore. Because this is the future, and in 3 years, the majority of Macs will probably be running Apple Silicons. To me they are really saying they are dropping support altogether, it is just a matter of time.

I've been a paying customer of Dropbox for about 6 years, and as a faithful Mac customer, I will buy my first M-X machine in a year or two. Hopefully they will change their mind by then.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.