Bah, 160kbps download speed would be better than dial-up, my only option. Well, excluding satellite, but I'm not interested in latencies (I'd like to play WoW someday again). I live 15 miles from Wisconsin state capital building, have 6 towers line of sight within 8 miles of my house (apparently none with a WISP), 21,000 wire run feet from nearest central office and they will not authorize a DSL connection (need to be 16,000 wire run feet or 3 miles for guaranteed minimum 768kbps-$15/month, 1.5mbps-$22/month). Your local pole to pole telephone wire/service drop wire hardware, I'm told, can negate/alter DSL service even if you live next to the central office or your neighbor gets it fine. Still waiting on further word from Verizon. Do they run you around on purpose? I've got cauliflower ear from being on the phone transfer train. No other competitors in my area, no cable access. Would consider moving, but I love my old house. Wait and wait some more. Can we hope for federal/state legislation, budget designations for infrastructure upgrades? Blah! Considering using cellular wireless for signal, but heard it gets on average 70kbps download. Good thing I don't run a business out of my home. Not interested in going broke on T1 lines or other such nonsense.
BTW, had a cable modem when I lived in downtown Madison, WI. It was 2 years ago, but if I remember, it was 1.5mbps download regularly. Didn't know how large the user base was for my area, but I heard that it makes a difference during peak usage times. But doesn't decrease with distance from central office. Cost about $45/month, no cable TV added. Sounds like urban/suburban CA has better offerings, what about the boondocks out there on the west coast?
I swear, I'll try not to rant on this in the future... maybe.