Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,993
41,496


Apple today shared a study commissioned from Analysis Group [PDF] that looks at App Store pricing changes before and after reduced fees took effect in the EU in March 2024 under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The report shows that the DMA has not resulted in lower prices for consumers.

App-Store-vs-EU-Feature-2.jpg

In a statement to MacRumors, Apple said that the DMA has reduced privacy and security without the outcomes that EU lawmakers expected.
The DMA has failed to live up to its promises, delivering less security, less privacy, and a worse experience for consumers across Europe. This study provides further evidence that the DMA is not benefiting consumers in the form of lower prices. At the same time, we know the regulation is creating new barriers for innovators and startups while exposing consumers to new risks.
The European Commission believes that if developers pay reduced fees, those savings will be passed on to consumers through lower prices, but the study suggests that lower fees have not led to lower App Store prices.

Analysis Group looked at 41 million App Store transactions across 21,000 paid apps and in-app purchases, comparing app prices for three months before developers enrolled in the alternative business terms to prices for three months after they enrolled. 91 percent of the time, prices did not go down, even though fees dropped by 10 percentage points on average. In some cases, developers raised their prices.

The top five EU app developers did not change their app pricing despite the reduced commission, instead keeping the additional revenue. Developers paid an estimated 20.1 million euros less in commission fees to Apple after the change. More than 86 percent of the savings went to developers outside of the European Union.

When developers did lower prices, the average decrease was 2.5 percent, seemingly unrelated to the DMA. Apple says that it saw the same effect when it launched the App Store Small Business Program. The lowered fees did not result in meaningful savings for consumers because only a small minority of developers decreased their prices.

The study says that the percentage of fee reductions does not change over a longer eight-month period, and that the Core Technology Fee paid by apps with more than one million first-time installs per year also does not change the results. 80 percent of the apps in the study did not pay the CTF.

The study was done on behalf of Apple, and it wasn't independently produced. It is limited to App Store data, and only applies to apps using Apple's services. It didn't include web or alternative marketplace pricing, and developers do have those distribution options under the DMA. A more in-depth look at the results and the data are available in the full study. [PDF].

Apple argues that the Digital Markets Act leads to a worse experience for consumers in the European Union, with less security, less privacy, less innovation, and more complexity. Apple has delayed several iOS 18 and iOS 26 features in the EU, and it attributes those delays to DMA requirements.

Live Translation was not available in the European Union when the AirPods Pro 3 launched, but it is coming soon. Apple hasn't found a way to bring iPhone Mirroring to non-Apple devices without privacy risks, so it remains unavailable. Automatic Wi-Fi network syncing is being disabled in iOS 26.2 because Apple wants to keep consumer Wi-Fi data from being shared with third parties. The DMA would give developers access to usernames, Wi-Fi network history, and more.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: EU's Digital Markets Act Failed to Lower App Store Prices, Apple-Commissioned Study Says
 
Seriously? Apple went out of its way to charge developers extra to allow them to publish apps on other app stores and is now pretending to be shocked that prices didn't go down? The fox is guarding the henhouse, here.

Apple argues that the Digital Markets Act leads to a worse experience for consumers in the European Union, with less security, less privacy, less innovation, and more complexity. Apple has delayed several iOS 18 and iOS 26 features in the EU, and it attributes those delays to DMA requirements.

Live Translation was not available in the European Union when the AirPods Pro 3 launched, but it is coming soon. Apple hasn't found a way to bring iPhone Mirroring to non-Apple devices without privacy risks, so it remains unavailable. Automatic Wi-Fi network syncing is being disabled in iOS 26.2 because Apple wants to keep consumer Wi-Fi data from being shared with third parties. The DMA would give developers access to usernames, Wi-Fi network history, and more.
No, Apple's choice to be actively hostile to users is what is leading to a worse user experience. The very fact that AirPods are getting Live Translation makes clear that it wasn't due to any EU law that it couldn't launch. They said PWAs on iPadOS couldn't be done in the EU anymore and rolled that back too despite nothing changing in the DMA. Their competitors are happily providing these features to EU users, despite having to follow those exact same laws.

The problem isn't the EU's laws. The problem here is Apple.
 
Is anyone really shocked? This entire scam was crafted for businesses with broken models like Spotify, so that they could increase margins and keep the investors placated just a little longer until the house of cards collapses. It was never about lowering prices, and never will be.

I recognize that the EU, hostile to business as it is (and composed of so many politicians that have never done an honest days work in their lives), would struggle to grasp the basic fact that a business is not going to take less money when they do not have to.
 
Didn’t need to commission a study to know this. We already saw it when Apple lowered fees for smaller developers from 30% to 15%. App prices stayed the same.

The best data point? 86% of transactions were from non-EU companies.

So much for helping EU consumers. All it did was line the pockets of foreign owned companies. Which we ALREADY knew was going to happen.
 
Apple today shared a study commissioned from Analysis Group [PDF] that looks at App Store pricing changes before and after reduced fees took effect in the EU in March 2024 under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The report shows that the DMA has not resulted in lower prices for consumers.
The DMA is more than about lowering prices. It's about user choice and freedom. It's about being able to get apps from places besides Apple's App Store because when Apple's in charge, they can pull apps off their store.


Apple pulls two gay dating apps in China under government order

November 11, 2025

BANGKOK (AP) — Apple said it has pulled two of China’s biggest gay dating apps, Blued and Finka, under pressure from Chinese authorities, in the latest sign of a tightening grip on the LGBTQ+ community.

An Apple spokesperson said in a statement that the company removed the two dating apps from China “based on an order from the Cyberspace Administration of China”, without further elaborating.

Another popular gay dating app, Grindr, was pulled from Apple’s app store in China in 2022.

Last year, Apple also reportedly removed apps including WhatsApp and Threads from its app store in China under an order by the Cyberspace Administration of China.



or Apple can be the moral police and decide what apps (e.g. porn) you cannot have.
 
Seriously? Apple went out of its way to charge developers extra to allow them to publish apps on other app stores and is now pretending to be shocked that prices didn't go down? The fox is guarding the henhouse, here.


No, Apple's choice to be actively hostile to users is what is leading to a worse user experience. The very fact that AirPods are getting Live Translation makes clear that it wasn't due to any EU law that it couldn't launch. They said PWAs on iPadOS couldn't be done in the EU anymore and rolled that back too despite nothing changing in the DMA. Their competitors are happily providing these features to EU users, despite having to follow those exact same laws.

The problem isn't the EU's laws. The problem here is Apple.
Well, it's the fox's henhouse, so yeah.
 
Didn’t need to commission a study to know this. We already saw it when Apple lowered fees for smaller developers from 30% to 15%. App prices stayed the same.

The best data point? 86% of transactions were from non-EU companies.

So much for helping EU consumers. All it did was line the pockets of foreign owned companies. Which we ALREADY knew was going to happen.

It's only if you stay below $1 million. Google did the same, but charges 15% of the first $1 million, regardless of total sales...and you don't have to sign up for it and be approved, which Apple requires.

The DMA is more than about lowering prices. It's about user choice and freedom. It's about being able to get apps from places besides Apple's App Store because when Apple's in charge, they can pull apps off their store.

Indeed. If one could download apps elsewhere, this wouldn't be as big of an issue:

 
Who’d have thought that makers of products price things based on what they can get away with and not what it cost them to make.. I mean, I’m in shock! lol… some very gullible people out here….
 
  • Like
Reactions: idrewuk
It's only if you stay below $1 million. Google did the same, but charges 15% of the first 1$ million, regardless of sales...and you don't have to sign up for it and be approved.



Indeed. If one could download apps elsewhere, this wouldn't be as big of an issue:


Irrelevant. App prices didn’t drop when fees dropped as everyone in favor of third party store claimed they would.

It was all lies promoted by large developers like Epic or Spotify to line their own pockets while telling people it was to lower prices for consumers.
 
Irrelevant. App prices didn’t drop when fees dropped as everyone in favor of third party store claimed they would.

It was all lies promoted by large developers like Epic or Spotify to line their own pockets while telling people it was to lower prices for consumers.

I don't really care. Choice & freedom > prices.

Either way, I'll believe this when the study isn't commissioned by the company that has an active interest in moving things back to way they were.
 
But at least now the business that did the work gets to keep their profits. Previously a company took 30% by force having done nothing at all 🤷‍♀️

This is an impressive degree of being wrong.

Building the platform, the store, maintaining it, providing APIs and access to customers, these are not 'doing nothing at all'.
 
Third party app stores will not be successful until they become international (beyond EU), because most developers will not do the extra work just for EU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben Sparrow
It doesn’t matter if prices go the customers go down or not. I’d still rather have the developer pocket the difference, at least they have more funds to develop the app further or develop apps that otherwise would not be viable. Other than that this is about having a way to install apps that Apple for whatever reason doesn’t want on its store. I’m so glad Apple lost this battle and that most major countries are implementing similar laws.
 
The European Commission believes that if developers pay reduced fees, those savings will be passed on to consumers through lower prices, but the study suggests that lower fees have not led to lower App Store prices.

Analysis Group looked at 41 million App Store transactions across 21,000 paid apps and in-app purchases, comparing app prices for three months before developers enrolled in the alternative business terms to prices for three months after they enrolled. 91 percent of the time, prices did not go down, even though fees dropped by 10 percentage points on average. In some cases, developers raised their prices.

So lower App Store fees did not result in lower app prices. Ever consider the possibility that lower App Store fees allowed app developers to keep prices where they were and not raise them like how some did?
 
So lower App Store fees did not result in lower app prices. Ever consider the possibility that lower App Store fees allowed app developers to keep prices where they were and not raise them like how some did?

It's not about lower App prices in my view, it's about consumer choice and more money staying in the pockets of those doing the work (developers).
 
This is an impressive degree of being wrong.

Building the platform, the store, maintaining it, providing APIs and access to customers, these are not 'doing nothing at all'.
Apple already charge for their own work. If they think it’s worth more they can charge more.
Apple did not sell me a Spotify subscription and neither did they build the Spotify app or platform. They’re just stealing from other developers at this point.

But sure lets say you’re right. When developers use another store Apple get nothing. Exactly as just happened.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.