Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,701
39,620



A new trend study published by Nielsen this week looks into the top smartphone apps of 2016, as well as the operating systems that the apps were downloaded on. This year within the United States, Facebook won the top spot with more than 146 million average unique users each month.

nielsen-apps-2-800x556.jpg

The social network company also dominated the second spot with Facebook Messenger at 129 million unique users per month. Following Facebook's winning of the top spots, Google holds most of the remaining spots with YouTube (113 million), Google Maps (105 million), Google Search (103 million), Google Play (99 million), and Gmail (88 million). Another Facebook-owned app in the 8th spot, Instagram (74 million), bookends the Google apps.

For Apple, the only app that appears on Nielsen's chart is Apple Music, with just over 68 million unique users each month, a growth of 20 percent from 2015. Earlier in December, it was reported that Apple's music streaming service had officially surpassed the 20 million subscriber mark. Amazon's popular shopping app rounds out the list in the 10th spot with 65 million monthly users.

nielsen-apps-3-800x607.jpg

In the third quarter of 2016, the apps were opened on average 53 percent of the time on an Android operating system and 45 percent on iOS, according to Nielsen's data of around 9,000 panelists. Windows Phone and BlackBerry accounted for a minimal portion of the statistics at 2 percent and 1 percent, respectively.

Article Link: Facebook and Google Dominate 'Top Smartphone Apps of 2016' List, While Apple Music Ranks 9th
 
I can't even imagen third parties having a look at the numbers about Apple Music users on iOS.
I mean, it's Nielson, so I think you have to volunteer to be part of their studies and you become part of their sampling pool. Not sure how they measure the use, is it like the old TV days where they install something on your device that tracks what you use? no idea..
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
I don't know anything about Nielson, but if that's the case, the whole list is irrelevant and unreliable imo.
They've been doing this for decades with television ratings, I think they try to select a scientific pool of people, at least to some degree. It would be as good as a drug trial where you seek volunteers and try to build a pool of people that would actually give decent data.

Back in the old days, it was using a device attached to your TV (there was a famous Rosanne and/or Simpsons episode about it). If they've adapted to streaming and smartphones etc, I'm assuming it's some kind of app that measures usage. But I'm too lazy to research it.

edit - here's their engineering site - https://engineeringforum.nielsen.com/sdk/developers/
 
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang
Google Play is where you download anything from them including apps.

Google Play, formerly known as the Android Market, is the official app store for Android smartphones and tablets. Google makes software applications, music, movies and books available for purchase and download through the store.

Why do these companies try to find ways to make Apple look like they are loosing when they are not. Add iTunes downloads and apps to their numbers and see what the totals come up to. Apple even separated video
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
What I find interesting is that Spotify, Pandora and other streaming services don't make the list. But it's impressive that Google Play has such a dominance. I thought that was just for its music streaming, but as genovelle pointed out, GP is also the app store for Android. So that makes sense.
 
You comment reads as some type of conspiracy against Apple is going on?
Because there always is. Why else do they makeup numbers or twist facts like in this article. Google play is not a competitor to Apple Music and they know it. It is a combination of four or five digital services, yet there is no mention of this fact. If it not intentional, I would like to know why these studies always make the mistake to Apple detriment. I call BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
Because there always is. Why else do they makeup numbers or twist facts like in this article. Google play is not a competitor to Apple Music and they know it. It is a combination of four or five digital services, yet there is no mention of this fact. If it not intentional, I would like to know why these studies always make the mistake to Apple detriment. I call BS.
Did you read the actual Nielson report? I got curious and did... they do a huge monthly survey.

METHODOLOGY
Nielsen’s Electronic Mobile Measurement is installed with permission on panelist smartphones (approximately 9,000 panelists ages 18+ with Android and iOS handsets). The panelists are recruited online in English and include Hispanic, African-American, Asian-American, Native American and Alaskan Native and other mixed racial background consumer representation.

This method provides a holistic view of all activity on a smartphone as the behavior is being tracked without interruption. Data is based on Nielsen’s monthly survey of 30,000-plus mobile subscribers aged 13 and up in the U.S. Mobile owners are asked to identify their primary mobile handset by manufacturer and model, which are weighted to be demographically representative of mobile subscribers in the U.S. Smartphone penetration reflects all models with a high-level operating system (including Apple iOS, Android, Windows and BlackBerry).
 
You have your opinion.

My opinion is that this grand conspiracy is all in your head!

Because there always is. Why else do they makeup numbers or twist facts like in this article. Google play is not a competitor to Apple Music and they know it. It is a combination of four or five digital services, yet there is no mention of this fact. If it not intentional, I would like to know why these studies always make the mistake to Apple detriment. I call BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang
Why do these companies try to find ways to make Apple look like they are loosing when they are not. Add iTunes downloads and apps to their numbers and see what the totals come up to. Apple even separated video
I think you're confusing your desire to see Apple "winning" with some universal conspiracy to see Apple lose. The survey counted unique visits to individual apps. Not sure how that can be construed as wanting Apple to lose. Lose what exactly?:confused: Nielsen didn't separate Apple's apps, Apple did. BTW, there's nothing to win here.

What I find interesting is that Spotify, Pandora and other streaming services don't make the list. But it's impressive that Google Play has such a dominance. I thought that was just for its music streaming, but as genovelle pointed out, GP is also the app store for Android. So that makes sense.
It's unique visits to an app, not all visits. I'm sure Spotify and Pandora have a ton of visits, a lot of which are repeat visits during the month. The App Store could theoretically be #11, but since it's not in the article we don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stella
I'm a little confused by this; does this include other built-in apps also. Because isn't Apple Music a built-in app? I would think Contacts and Calendar and Mail and Messages would be on the list. I use them every day all day (at least always open in background.) I use AM but not every day like those others I just mentioned. Maybe this is just me...
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
I'm a little confused by this; does this include other built-in apps also. Because isn't Apple Music a built-in app? I would think Contacts and Calendar and Mail and Messages would be on the list. I use them every day all day (at least always open in background.) I use AM but not every day like those others I just mentioned. Maybe this is just me...
You're use would only count as 1 unique visit per month. The survey is about unique, or new, visits per month not quantity of visits over all.
 
Don't use any of the top items. FB, Messenger or any Google App. Got rid of them all. Move everything over to iCloud. Not a fan of being a product and having my personal stuff mined. Got rid of my FB account as well. Serves no real purpose and you can use that "keep in touch" line all you want but if I really want to keep in touch, I'll message you or call. Memory and battery hogs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Wow I must be out of touch or not in their demographics.
I don't have 6 of the top apps installed on my iPhone
 
Don't use any of the top items. FB, Messenger or any Google App. Got rid of them all. Move everything over to iCloud. Not a fan of being a product and having my personal stuff mined. Got rid of my FB account as well. Serves no real purpose and you can use that "keep in touch" line all you want but if I really want to keep in touch, I'll message you or call. Memory and battery hogs.
Agreed on FB and Messenger. Yuck. These two apps actually put me off of keeping in touch with people.

I use Google services because half of my phone use is on Android and it's the best option for Android, but I lock down my privacy settings as best I can. They do give you tools to do that but it requires constant vigilance to maintain them. I can certainly understand why someone would avoid Google.
 
I don't know anything about Nielson, but if that's the case, the whole list is irrelevant and unreliable imo.
Nielsen has been around for decades doing this type of stuff and they are the gold standard when it comes to ratings, not that I agree with their choices. Television series used to live and die by Nielsen. You can read how they did their data collection.

Now you have to download an app to "spy" on you". So it essentially boils down to 9,000 random people given an invite and download the app. And that data is extrapolated. Accurate or not? I don't know. I looked at the top 10 and have only gmail and youtube.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.