Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Spacedust

macrumors 65816
Original poster
May 24, 2009
1,005
160
Is it possible to put slower memory to Mac Pro 2008 ?

Will they be automatically overclocked to 800 MHz if you mix some 667 and 800 modules ?
 
If you mix and matched 667 Mhz ram in with 800 Mhz ram it will work, but it will slow all the 800 Mhz ram down to 667. Depending on what your doing the difference between 800 Mhz and 667 Mhz ram could be negligible, and having more ram might cancel out the speed difference.
 
What about FSB ? Will it work at 1600 MHz or 1333 MHz then ?
If you mix 667 and 800MHz memory, it will downclock all of it to 667MHz. That translates to an FSB of 1333MHz in practical use, as the memory's not running fast enough to use the remaining bandwidth.

So if you need/want the FSB to remain at 1600, you need to get the 800MHz RDIMM's for your system.
 
Thanks for anwers. I'm will get my MP 2008 next week with 2 GB RAM, so I ordered another 6 GB RAM 800 MHz.

My current 12 GB seems to be unusable. 8 GB is more than enough.
 
...would the speed difference in the modules be offset by the much larger capacity of RAM being used as the OP has 12 GB of the 667 Mhz RAM available vs the 6 GB on order?
Generally speaking, it's not a good idea to mix memory like that. Though it will downclock, the actuall position even matters, as the SPD (timings) are read on one of the DIMM's per channel, not all of them. So you can actually confuse the system (i.e. attempt to OC the memory in some cases). It gets down to the firmware.

So to prevent issues, stick with the same memory. Now if you have an '08, you could go ahead and use all 667MHz memory. The throughput is slower, but there are cases where the speed is less important than capacity. It's up to the user to determine that. But the cost difference between the two types isn't that bad last I checked, so might as well get what the system can actually utilize fully. ;)
 
I have mixed matched my Mac Pro (early 2008) with 800Mhz and 667Mhz DIMMs with no problems before. It just downclocks the ram to 667Mhz. Not the Front Side Bus as someone seemed to suggest.
 
I have mixed matched my Mac Pro (early 2008) with 800Mhz and 667Mhz DIMMs with no problems before. It just downclocks the ram to 667Mhz. Not the Front Side Bus as someone seemed to suggest.
It's just easier to prevent issues by keeping it the same if possible. I've seen issues with some systems (in general), as the SPD was determined by one of the DIMM slots per channel (specific location). So if that location was filled with the faster sticks, problems came about (unstable).

I didn't have the differing clocked memory to test in an MP, but knew it's technically possible to mix it, as others such as yourself have (posted some time ago).

As per the FSB, it's not that it actually slows down, but the memory can't exceed 1333. Other aspects of the system (i.e.chipsets for example), will remain the same.
 
So, how 'bout 1066MHz ram in an early '08 8 core 2.8 Mac Pro?

1066MHz DDR2 RDIMMs would probably work, but...

1. It would downclock to 800MHz on a 2008 MP.
2. I don't think anyone makes 1066MHz DDR2 RDIMMs with Apple-approved heat spreaders. Most of the ones I've seen don't have heat spreaders.

...so, it's kind of pointless.
 
1066MHz DDR2 RDIMMs would probably work, but...

1. It would downclock to 800MHz on a 2008 MP.
2. I don't think anyone makes 1066MHz DDR2 RDIMMs with Apple-approved heat spreaders. Most of the ones I've seen don't have heat spreaders.

...so, it's kind of pointless.

That sucks. Thanks for the reply though. :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.