If anything it's a favor that AT&T is doing by unlocking their other phones after the contact ends...
They have no obligation to do anything tbh...
I disagree, I understand if you are still under contract as you get the subsidized price, however, you own the phone and after the fulfillment of the contract you should be freed of your ties to them.
you own the phone and after the fulfillment of the contract you should be freed of your ties to them.
x3.i agree. the subsidy buys your obligation to the contract. your phone should never be locked.
This is in need of clarification.Just as they do it for their other phones. It should be illegal if you ask me!
If you knew that the phone was locked and would remain so at the end of the contract then you had the choice not to buy it. It is not the Federal Governments (FCC) place to tell AT&T to lock or unlock their phones.
If anything it's a favor that AT&T is doing by unlocking their other phones after the contact ends...
They have no obligation to do anything tbh...
Before the iPhone, AT&T would unlock any phone after about 90 days to a customer in good standing who needed it for going overseas.
At the least, a phone should be unlocked after it's paid for, whcih AT&T says takes about 18-21 months for the iPhone.
For that matter, not only should a phone be unlocked after a customer has paid for it, but the contract should drop in price since they're no long paying back a subsidy.
--
That said, about half the carriers in the world also sell locked iPhones.
Whenever people brag about the iPhone changing the smartphone business, they ignore how much of that change was for the worse: not only with permanently locked phones, but with data plans being required, and the end of truly unlimited data.