You can try - if not always successfully - for a little balance and fairness when attempting to assess his life and legacy.
That means neither hagiography, nor myopic and reflexive condemnation.
Those who condemn Mr Castro so blithely fail to see that the deplorable and disgracefully corrupt conditions of Cuban society and the Cuban state under Mr Batista - whose regime was supported by the US, and organised crime - were precisely the conditions which enabled the rise - and successful revolution - of Mr Castro.
Frankly, the other thread (in PRSI) discussing this very topic is an absolute disgrace - pretending neither to objectivity, nor any attempt at any sort of analysis, nor even acknowledgement, let alone mastery - of basic facts - but is merely an excuse to vent witless bile.